Sony
Sony Alpha A7 IV
$2499
Released 2021-12
Best Mirrorless Cameras · head-to-head
Sony Alpha A7 IV vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Sony Alpha A7 IV is cheaper at $2499. Every spec and price links to its source.
Canon
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
$2499
Released 2022-12
Which is better: the Sony Alpha A7 IV or Canon EOS R6 Mark II?
They split the 2 specs we compare evenly.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Key specs, head to head
The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Sony Alpha A7 IV | Canon EOS R6 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $2499 | $2499 |
| Brand | Sony | Canon |
| Released | 2021-12 | 2022-12 |
| Sensor format | Full-frame | Full-frame |
| Megapixels | 33 | 24.2 |
| Max video | 4K@60p | 4K@60p |
| Ibis | Yes | Yes |
| Mount | Sony E | Canon RF |
| Continuous (fps) | 10 | 40 |
| Weight (g) | 658 | 670 |
| Release | 2021-12 | 2022-12 |
Sources — Sony Alpha A7 IV: imaging-resource.com (verified 2026-06-15). Canon EOS R6 Mark II: usa.canon.com (verified 2026-06-15).
What's the difference between the Sony Alpha A7 IV and Canon EOS R6 Mark II?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Megapixels: Sony Alpha A7 IV 33 vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II 24.2
- Mount: Sony Alpha A7 IV Sony E vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II Canon RF
- Continuous (fps): Sony Alpha A7 IV 10 vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II 40
- Weight (g): Sony Alpha A7 IV 658 vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II 670
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Sony Alpha A7 IV
Two whitelisted hands-on reviews (TechRadar, Engadget) survived verification and agree the A7 IV is the best all-round hybrid mirrorless of its era: class-leading autofocus, strong 33MP stills and oversampled 10-bit 4:2:2 4K video. Both flag pronounced rolling shutter with the electronic shutter, a cropped Super 35 4K/60p mode, a price increase over the A7 III, and merely-average 10fps burst. All quotes are verbatim in the source text and all measured values are supported. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Class-leading autofocus with reliable subject/eye tracking for stills and video; Powerful hybrid video: oversampled 4K with 10-bit 4:2:2 color; Strong high-ISO/low-light performance and accurate out-of-camera color.
Flagged: Pronounced rolling shutter with the electronic/silent shutter; 4K/60p only available with a cropped Super 35 (APS-C) mode; Price hike over the A7 III (~$500 per Engadget; ~20-30% per TechRadar).
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Both whitelisted hands-on testers (TechRadar, Tom's Guide) rate the R6 Mark II a top-tier hybrid: excellent deep-learned subject/eye-tracking autofocus, clean high-ISO images and 40fps electronic-shutter bursts with a deep buffer. Both flag its high price and modest 24MP resolution. They split on stabilization: Tom's Guide reports the full 8 stops and lists it as a pro, whereas TechRadar measured only ~4 usable stops at 105mm and found the IBIS unconvincing, especially for video. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Excellent deep-learned autofocus and subject/eye tracking; Clean, low-noise image quality at very high ISO; Fast 40fps electronic-shutter burst with deep buffer.
Flagged: Expensive relative to rivals (Sony A7 IV, Lumix S5 II, Nikon Z6 II); Modest 24MP resolution, unremarkable for a full-frame camera; IBIS falls short of the claimed 8 stops and struggles with video camera movement.