DeWalt
DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw
$599.99Cheaper
Released 2017
Best Miter Saws · head-to-head
DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw vs Makita LS1019L 10-Inch Dual-Bevel Sliding Compound Miter Saw with Laser
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw is cheaper at $599.99. Every spec and price links to its source.
Which is better: the DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw or Makita LS1019L 10-Inch Dual-Bevel Sliding Compound Miter Saw with Laser?
The DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw is the cheaper at $599.99. The DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.
See DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw on Amazon See Makita LS1019L 10-Inch Dual-Bevel Sliding Compound Miter Saw with Laser on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw |  Makita LS1019L 10-Inch Dual-Bevel Sliding Compound Miter Saw with Laser |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $599.99 | $799 |
| Brand | DeWalt | Makita |
| Released | 2017 | — |
| Blade size (in) | 12 | 10 |
| Type | sliding_compound | sliding_compound |
| Power source | corded | corded |
| Bevel range | 48 L/48 R | 48 L/48 R |
| Max crosscut (in) | 2x14 in at 90 | 12 in at 90 |
| Laser or shadow guide | No | Yes |
| Weight (lb) | 56 | 57.9 |
| Release | 2017 | — |
Sources — DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw: dewalt.com (verified 2026-06-20). Makita LS1019L 10-Inch Dual-Bevel Sliding Compound Miter Saw with Laser: makitatools.com (verified 2026-06-20).
What's the difference between the DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw and Makita LS1019L 10-Inch Dual-Bevel Sliding Compound Miter Saw with Laser?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Blade size (in): DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw 12 vs Makita LS1019L 10-Inch Dual-Bevel Sliding Compound Miter Saw with Laser 10
- Max crosscut (in): DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw 2x14 in at 90 vs Makita LS1019L 10-Inch Dual-Bevel Sliding Compound Miter Saw with Laser 12 in at 90
- Laser or shadow guide: DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw false vs Makita LS1019L 10-Inch Dual-Bevel Sliding Compound Miter Saw with Laser true
- Weight (lb): DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw 56 vs Makita LS1019L 10-Inch Dual-Bevel Sliding Compound Miter Saw with Laser 57.9
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
DeWalt DWS779 12-Inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw
No sourced tester review yet.
Makita LS1019L 10-Inch Dual-Bevel Sliding Compound Miter Saw with Laser
Only one whitelisted tester covered this exact model: Pro Tool Reviews, and their August 2017 piece is a hands-on first look/preview, not a lab test with measured numbers (the writer explicitly defers judgment on dust collection until real use). They praise the direct-drive motor with soft start, the vertical 2-rail system, near-12-inch vertical capacity from a 10-inch blade, and the 60T carbide stock blade; they flag the premium $549 price (without stand) and prefer a shadow-line indicator over the included laser. (1 sourced review.)
Praised: Direct-drive motor with soft start gives more stable cutting speed in tougher materials; Vertical 2-rail system lets the saw sit flush to the wall without losing cross-cut capacity, saving shop space; Near-12-inch vertical capacity from a 10-inch blade that resists wobble.
Flagged: Premium $549 price point (without stand); Reviewer prefers a shadow-line indicator over the included laser; First-look coverage only; dust collection and cut accuracy were not yet hands-on verified.