Best NAS Devices · head-to-head

QNAP TS-464 vs TerraMaster F4-424 Pro

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. QNAP TS-464 is cheaper at $639. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the QNAP TS-464 or TerraMaster F4-424 Pro?

The TerraMaster F4-424 Pro wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The QNAP TS-464 is the cheaper at $639. Get the TerraMaster F4-424 Pro for the stronger spec sheet, the QNAP TS-464 to spend less.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Key specs, head to head

The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.

RAM (GB)
QNAP TS-464 8
TerraMaster F4-424 Pro 32

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec QNAP TS-464 TerraMaster F4-424 Pro
US price $639 $687.99
BrandQNAPTerraMaster
Released20222023
Bays 4 4
CPU Intel Celeron N5095 (4-core, up to 2.9 GHz) Intel Core i3-N305 (8-core 8-thread, up to 3.8 GHz)
RAM (GB) 8 32
Max capacity (TB) 96 96
Ethernet 2x 2.5GbE (10GbE via PCIe expansion card) 2x 2.5GbE
M2 slots 2 2
Raid RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, RAID 6, RAID 10, JBOD RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, RAID 6, RAID 10, JBOD
Release 2022 2023

Sources — QNAP TS-464: qnap.com (verified 2026-06-15). TerraMaster F4-424 Pro: terra-master.com (verified 2026-06-15).

What's the difference between the QNAP TS-464 and TerraMaster F4-424 Pro?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (3 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.

  • CPU: QNAP TS-464 Intel Celeron N5095 (4-core, up to 2.9 GHz) vs TerraMaster F4-424 Pro Intel Core i3-N305 (8-core 8-thread, up to 3.8 GHz)
  • RAM (GB): QNAP TS-464 8 vs TerraMaster F4-424 Pro 32
  • Ethernet: QNAP TS-464 2x 2.5GbE (10GbE via PCIe expansion card) vs TerraMaster F4-424 Pro 2x 2.5GbE

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

QNAP TS-464

Only one whitelisted lab tester, StorageReview, published a hands-on benchmark of the exact QNAP TS-464 (Oct 2022). It measured the four-bay NAS meeting or beating the older TS-453D on SMB throughput and calls it a great value at $549 diskless, while noting that some gains are marginal and 128K sequential reads actually came in lower than the prior model in the test config. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Beats the older TS-453D on SMB read/write throughput in lab benchmarks; Strong value at the $549 diskless base price for SMB and home users; Expandable: two M.2 NVMe Gen3 slots, PCIe Gen3 x2, up to 16GB RAM, dual 2.5GbE.

Flagged: 128K sequential reads came in 6.8% lower than the TS-453D in the test config; Some measured performance gains over the prior model are only marginal; Ships diskless with just 4GB RAM at the base configuration.

TerraMaster F4-424 Pro

Two whitelisted hands-on reviews of this exact model, both from its early-2024 launch window. Both call the 8-core i3-N300 with 32GB DDR5 genuinely powerful for Docker, VMs and multi-user work, and both flag the high price ($699 / €730) and the near-useless HDMI output, which shows only Linux console text because TOS has no graphical interface. Measured throughput is network-bound: Notebookcheck recorded 210 MB/s write and 296 MB/s read, TechRadar puts the ceiling at around 280MB/s over a single 2.5GbE port. Only Notebookcheck published power and noise figures (23.8 watts idle, 33.7 dB idle). (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)

Praised: Powerful 8-core Intel Core i3-N300 with 32GB DDR5 leaves real headroom for Docker, VMs and multi-user office work; Dual 2.5GbE with link aggregation, plus two M.2 NVMe slots usable as ordinary storage or as cache — not locked to cache duty; 10 Gbit/s USB-A and USB-C ports on the rear (TechRadar specifies USB 3.2 Gen 2).

Flagged: High price — $699 in the US / €729.99 in Europe, a flat $200 more than the vanilla F4-424 and far above the F4-423 predecessor (about €336 at the time); HDMI output is nearly useless — no graphical interface in TOS, only Linux console output; TOS trails Synology's DSM in polish and functionality (TechRadar adds that TeraSync, Centralized Backup, Log Center and Surveillance Manager are all still in Beta; Notebookcheck adds there is no terminal package manager such as yum or apt).

← All nas devices compared · Open data