Best Nebulizers · head-to-head

Philips InnoSpire Go vs Beurer IH60

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Beurer IH60 is cheaper at $88. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Philips InnoSpire Go or Beurer IH60?

The Philips InnoSpire Go wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Beurer IH60 is the cheaper at $88. Get the Philips InnoSpire Go for the stronger spec sheet, the Beurer IH60 to spend less.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Philips InnoSpire Go Beurer IH60
US price $189.99 $88
BrandPhilips RespironicsBeurer
Released2017
Particle size micron 3.99 4.12
Nebulization rate ml min 0.29 0.25
Medication cup capacity (ml) 8
Noise level (dB) 35 45
Power source Rechargeable Li-ion battery or AC adapter, 100-240V 50/60Hz Rechargeable Li-ion battery or AC mains, 100-240V 50/60Hz
Atomizer type vibrating mesh (Vibronic) compressor (compressed-air technology, 0.25-0.5 bar)
Weight (g) 113 222
Treatment time min 4

Sources — Philips InnoSpire Go: manualslib.com (verified 2026-08-01). Beurer IH60: essentialaids.com (verified 2026-08-01).

What's the difference between the Philips InnoSpire Go and Beurer IH60?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (6 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Particle size micron: Philips InnoSpire Go 3.99 vs Beurer IH60 4.12
  • Nebulization rate ml min: Philips InnoSpire Go 0.29 vs Beurer IH60 0.25
  • Noise level (dB): Philips InnoSpire Go 35 vs Beurer IH60 45
  • Power source: Philips InnoSpire Go Rechargeable Li-ion battery or AC adapter, 100-240V 50/60Hz vs Beurer IH60 Rechargeable Li-ion battery or AC mains, 100-240V 50/60Hz
  • Atomizer type: Philips InnoSpire Go vibrating mesh (Vibronic) vs Beurer IH60 compressor (compressed-air technology, 0.25-0.5 bar)
  • Weight (g): Philips InnoSpire Go 113 vs Beurer IH60 222

← All nebulizers compared · Open data