Best Network Switches · head-to-head

TP-Link JetStream TL-SG3210XHP-M2 vs QNAP QSW-M2108-2C

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. QNAP QSW-M2108-2C is cheaper at $349. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the TP-Link JetStream TL-SG3210XHP-M2 or QNAP QSW-M2108-2C?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The QNAP QSW-M2108-2C is the cheaper at $349.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec TP-Link JetStream TL-SG3210XHP-M2 QNAP QSW-M2108-2C
US price $419.99 $349
BrandTP-LinkQNAP
Released
Total ports 10 10
Max port speed (Gbps) 10 10
Multi gig ports 8 8
Sfp plus ports 2 2
Switching capacity (Gbps) 80 80
Forwarding rate mpps 59.52
Management type L2-managed smart-web-managed
Poe standard PoE+ (802.3at) none
Poe budget watts 240 0
Mac table size
Fanless No No
Power consumption watts 17.2 12.17

Sources — TP-Link JetStream TL-SG3210XHP-M2: omadanetworks.com (verified 2026-07-11). QNAP QSW-M2108-2C: store.qnap.com (verified 2026-07-11).

What's the difference between the TP-Link JetStream TL-SG3210XHP-M2 and QNAP QSW-M2108-2C?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 12). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Management type: TP-Link JetStream TL-SG3210XHP-M2 L2-managed vs QNAP QSW-M2108-2C smart-web-managed
  • Poe standard: TP-Link JetStream TL-SG3210XHP-M2 PoE+ (802.3at) vs QNAP QSW-M2108-2C none
  • Poe budget watts: TP-Link JetStream TL-SG3210XHP-M2 240 vs QNAP QSW-M2108-2C 0
  • Power consumption watts: TP-Link JetStream TL-SG3210XHP-M2 17.2 vs QNAP QSW-M2108-2C 12.17

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

TP-Link JetStream TL-SG3210XHP-M2

Only one whitelisted tester — TechRadar — published a hands-on review of this exact TL-SG3210XHP-M2. TechRadar rates it strong value: eight 2.5GbE PoE+ ports, a 240W power budget and a responsive Omada web UI, but flags a loud continuous fan and a required external hardware controller for cloud access. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Strong value for the port count and 240W PoE budget; Responsive, lag-free Omada web management interface; Compact size with dual 10G SFP+ uplinks for expansion.

Flagged: Loud continuous fans make it unsuitable for an office/desk; Cloud access requires a separate Omada hardware controller.

QNAP QSW-M2108-2C

No sourced tester review yet.

← All network switches compared · Open data