Best Night Vision Monoculars · head-to-head
ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x Thermal Smart HD Monocular vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3 Thermal Weapon Sight / Handheld Monocular
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x Thermal Smart HD Monocular is cheaper at $1699. Every spec and price links to its source.
ATN Corp
$1699Cheaper
vs Bering Optics
$3120
Which is better: the ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x Thermal Smart HD Monocular or Bering Optics Super Hogster A3 Thermal Weapon Sight / Handheld Monocular?
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x Thermal Smart HD Monocular is the cheaper at $1699.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x Thermal Smart HD Monocular | Bering Optics Super Hogster A3 Thermal Weapon Sight / Handheld Monocular |
| US price | $1699 | $3120 |
| Brand | ATN Corp | Bering Optics |
| Released | — | — |
| Sensor resolution px | 384x288 | 384x288 (12-micron thermal core) |
| Magnification | 1.25-5x (digital zoom on fixed thermal optic) | 2.9-11.6x |
| Detection range yd | — | — |
| Ir illuminator | N/A — passive Obsidian IV Dual Core T thermal sensor, no IR illuminator | N/A — passive thermal imager, no IR illuminator |
| Display | 1280x720 HD micro-display (OLED) | AMOLED display, 50Hz refresh, WiFi app streaming |
| Battery runtime hr | — | — |
| Recording | Photo & video (1280x960 @ 30/60fps), 720p WiFi streaming, GPS, Bluetooth | Photo & video, WiFi app streaming |
| IP water rating | — | — |
Sources — ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x Thermal Smart HD Monocular: atncorp.com (verified 2026-08-11).
Bering Optics Super Hogster A3 Thermal Weapon Sight / Handheld Monocular: triggersandscopes.com (verified 2026-08-11).
What's the difference between the ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x Thermal Smart HD Monocular and Bering Optics Super Hogster A3 Thermal Weapon Sight / Handheld Monocular?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.
- Sensor resolution px: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x Thermal Smart HD Monocular 384x288 vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3 Thermal Weapon Sight / Handheld Monocular 384x288 (12-micron thermal core)
- Magnification: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x Thermal Smart HD Monocular 1.25-5x (digital zoom on fixed thermal optic) vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3 Thermal Weapon Sight / Handheld Monocular 2.9-11.6x
- Ir illuminator: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x Thermal Smart HD Monocular N/A — passive Obsidian IV Dual Core T thermal sensor, no IR illuminator vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3 Thermal Weapon Sight / Handheld Monocular N/A — passive thermal imager, no IR illuminator
- Display: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x Thermal Smart HD Monocular 1280x720 HD micro-display (OLED) vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3 Thermal Weapon Sight / Handheld Monocular AMOLED display, 50Hz refresh, WiFi app streaming
- Recording: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x Thermal Smart HD Monocular Photo & video (1280x960 @ 30/60fps), 720p WiFi streaming, GPS, Bluetooth vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3 Thermal Weapon Sight / Handheld Monocular Photo & video, WiFi app streaming