Best Open Ear Earbuds · head-to-head

Bose Ultra Open Earbuds vs Shokz OpenFit Pro

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Shokz OpenFit Pro is cheaper at $249.95. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Bose Ultra Open Earbuds or Shokz OpenFit Pro?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Shokz OpenFit Pro is the cheaper at $249.95.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Bose Ultra Open Earbuds Shokz OpenFit Pro
US price $299 $249.95
BrandBoseShokz
Released2024-022025
Msrp usd 299 249.95
Fit style cuff hook
Driver size (mm)
Battery buds hours 7 12
Battery total hours 27 50
Bluetooth version 5.3 6.1
IP rating IPX4 IP55
Weight per bud grams 12.3
Wireless charging No Yes
Multipoint connect Yes Yes

Sources — Bose Ultra Open Earbuds: bose.com (verified 2026-06-27). Shokz OpenFit Pro: shokz.com (verified 2026-06-27).

What's the difference between the Bose Ultra Open Earbuds and Shokz OpenFit Pro?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (7 of 10). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Msrp usd: Bose Ultra Open Earbuds 299 vs Shokz OpenFit Pro 249.95
  • Fit style: Bose Ultra Open Earbuds cuff vs Shokz OpenFit Pro hook
  • Battery buds hours: Bose Ultra Open Earbuds 7 vs Shokz OpenFit Pro 12
  • Battery total hours: Bose Ultra Open Earbuds 27 vs Shokz OpenFit Pro 50
  • Bluetooth version: Bose Ultra Open Earbuds 5.3 vs Shokz OpenFit Pro 6.1
  • IP rating: Bose Ultra Open Earbuds IPX4 vs Shokz OpenFit Pro IP55
  • Wireless charging: Bose Ultra Open Earbuds false vs Shokz OpenFit Pro true

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Bose Ultra Open Earbuds

All four whitelisted outlets (SoundGuys, What Hi-Fi, TechRadar, Engadget) reviewed this exact model hands-on. All four praise the comfortable clip-on open fit that stays put during workouts and all-day wear. Three (SoundGuys, What Hi-Fi, TechRadar) explicitly flag the $299 / £299 price as high. They split sharply on sound: TechRadar and What Hi-Fi call the bass impressively full, while SoundGuys and Engadget find it subdued and the open design a genuine compromise. (4 sourced reviews, 4 lab-tested.)

Praised: Comfortable, secure clip-on open fit that stays put during workouts and all-day wear; Situational awareness suits running, cycling and office use; Very little sound leakage for an open design.

Flagged: Expensive at $299 / £299, on par with Bose's flagship in-ear ANC buds; Subdued bass and sound quality compromised versus sealed in-ear buds; Mediocre microphone / call quality in wind or ambient noise.

Shokz OpenFit Pro

Two whitelisted testers reviewed the Shokz OpenFit Pro: SoundGuys (two weeks hands-on, with measured noise-reduction and battery data) and Engadget (weeks of qualitative testing). Both call it Shokz's best-sounding open-ear earbuds and confirm the new Open-Ear Noise Reduction genuinely dampens midrange noise (office chatter, HVAC hum) while being far weaker than true ANC and useless against low-frequency/travel noise. SoundGuys measured ~13% total reduction and ~13 dB midrange attenuation, and flags an uncomfortable ANC-style pressure sensation plus a hard-to-justify $50 premium; its only call complaint is wind, otherwise rating call quality highly. Engadget separately knocks below-average, muffled call voice quality. (2 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Best sound quality yet for open-ear earbuds, with notably stronger bass; Open-Ear Noise Reduction genuinely works on midrange noise (office chatter, HVAC hum, cafes); Comfortable, secure and more stable fit; suitable for workouts (IP55).

Flagged: Noise reduction is limited: no help against low-frequency/travel noise and far weaker than true ANC; Call voice quality is muffled / below average (Engadget); Wind ruins outdoor calls; mics suffer in strong gusts (SoundGuys).

← All open ear earbuds compared · Open data