Apple
Apple AirPods Max (USB-C)
$549
Released 2024-09
Best Over Ear Headphones · head-to-head
Apple AirPods Max (USB-C) vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 is cheaper at $399. Every spec and price links to its source.
Beyerdynamic
Beyerdynamic Aventho 300
$399Cheaper
Released 2024
Which is better: the Apple AirPods Max (USB-C) or Beyerdynamic Aventho 300?
The Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 is the cheaper at $399. The Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Apple AirPods Max (USB-C) | Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $549 | $399 |
| Brand | Apple | Beyerdynamic |
| Released | 2024-09 | 2024 |
| ANC | Yes | Yes |
| Driver (mm) | 40 | — |
| Battery hr | 20 | 50 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Codecs | SBC, AAC | AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3 |
| Wired option | Yes | Yes |
| Weight (g) | 386 | 319 |
| Release | 2024-09 | 2024 |
Sources — Apple AirPods Max (USB-C): apple.com (verified 2026-06-15). Beyerdynamic Aventho 300: north-america.beyerdynamic.com (verified 2026-06-15).
What's the difference between the Apple AirPods Max (USB-C) and Beyerdynamic Aventho 300?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Battery hr: Apple AirPods Max (USB-C) 20 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 50
- Bluetooth: Apple AirPods Max (USB-C) 5.3 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 5.4
- Codecs: Apple AirPods Max (USB-C) SBC, AAC vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3
- Weight (g): Apple AirPods Max (USB-C) 386 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 319
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Apple AirPods Max (USB-C)
SoundGuys' measured review of the USB-C AirPods Max verifies fantastic active noise canceling and very solid wireless sound quality, with tested battery life reaching roughly 21 hours (ANC on or off). Their verdict: a great-sounding, well-built pair that is nonetheless overpriced. The USB-C model measures slightly more high-end than the Lightning version. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Active noise canceling is fantastic; Sound quality is very solid for wireless headphones; Tested battery life ~21 hours, beating Apple's claim.
Flagged: Overpriced for what it offers.
Beyerdynamic Aventho 300
Two whitelisted testers reviewed the exact Aventho 300: SoundGuys (lab-measured, 6.7/10) and What Hi-Fi (hands-on, 4/5 stars). Both praise the long 50-plus-hour battery, the build and the feature set, and both flag mediocre ANC that trails class leaders like Bose. They diverge on sound: SoundGuys measures over-emphasized bass and harsh treble and gives a poor 2.5/5 MDAQS score, while What Hi-Fi hears a clean, even-handed signature that simply lacks the dynamism of rivals like the Dali IO-8. SoundGuys is far harsher on value and comfort; What Hi-Fi calls them solid performers for the money. No other whitelisted outlet had a fetchable review. (2 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Exceptional battery life (50-plus hours rated, ~65h measured with ANC) plus fast charging; Premium build quality with foldable metal frame/hinges (SoundGuys also praises the hardcover case); Strong connectivity and features: Bluetooth 5.4, aptX Lossless/Adaptive, multipoint, Dolby Atmos, custom EQ.
Flagged: Mediocre ANC that trails class leaders like Bose; Sound isn't class-leading: SoundGuys flags over-emphasized bass and harsh treble (2.5/5 MDAQS), What Hi-Fi finds less dynamic contrast than the Dali IO-8; Comfort issues from the 319g weight, stiff pads, clamping force and heat build-up (SoundGuys).