Best Over Ear Headphones · head-to-head

Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 vs Beats Studio Pro

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Beats Studio Pro is cheaper at $350. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 or Beats Studio Pro?

The Beats Studio Pro wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Beats Studio Pro is the cheaper at $350. The Beats Studio Pro both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Beats Studio Pro
US price $399 $350
BrandBeyerdynamicBeats
Released20242023-07
ANC Yes Yes
Driver (mm) 40
Battery hr 50 24
Bluetooth 5.4
Codecs AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3 SBC, AAC
Wired option Yes Yes
Weight (g) 319 260
Release 2024 2023-07

Sources — Beyerdynamic Aventho 300: north-america.beyerdynamic.com (verified 2026-06-15). Beats Studio Pro: beatsbydre.com (verified 2026-06-15).

What's the difference between the Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 and Beats Studio Pro?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (3 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Battery hr: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 50 vs Beats Studio Pro 24
  • Codecs: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3 vs Beats Studio Pro SBC, AAC
  • Weight (g): Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 319 vs Beats Studio Pro 260

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 300

Two whitelisted testers reviewed the exact Aventho 300: SoundGuys (lab-measured, 6.7/10) and What Hi-Fi (hands-on, 4/5 stars). Both praise the long 50-plus-hour battery, the build and the feature set, and both flag mediocre ANC that trails class leaders like Bose. They diverge on sound: SoundGuys measures over-emphasized bass and harsh treble and gives a poor 2.5/5 MDAQS score, while What Hi-Fi hears a clean, even-handed signature that simply lacks the dynamism of rivals like the Dali IO-8. SoundGuys is far harsher on value and comfort; What Hi-Fi calls them solid performers for the money. No other whitelisted outlet had a fetchable review. (2 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Exceptional battery life (50-plus hours rated, ~65h measured with ANC) plus fast charging; Premium build quality with foldable metal frame/hinges (SoundGuys also praises the hardcover case); Strong connectivity and features: Bluetooth 5.4, aptX Lossless/Adaptive, multipoint, Dolby Atmos, custom EQ.

Flagged: Mediocre ANC that trails class leaders like Bose; Sound isn't class-leading: SoundGuys flags over-emphasized bass and harsh treble (2.5/5 MDAQS), What Hi-Fi finds less dynamic contrast than the Dali IO-8; Comfort issues from the 319g weight, stiff pads, clamping force and heat build-up (SoundGuys).

Beats Studio Pro

No sourced tester review yet.

← All over ear headphones compared · Open data