Best Over Ear Headphones · head-to-head

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones is cheaper at $199. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones or Beyerdynamic Aventho 300?

The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones is the cheaper at $199. The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones Beyerdynamic Aventho 300
US price $199 $399
BrandBoseBeyerdynamic
Released2023-102024
ANC Yes Yes
Driver (mm) — —
Battery (hr) 24 50
Bluetooth 5.3 5.4
Codecs SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3
Wired option Yes Yes
Weight (g) 250 319
Release 2023-10 2024

Sources — Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones: target.com (verified 2026-09-28). Beyerdynamic Aventho 300: north-america.beyerdynamic.com (verified 2026-10-08).

What's the difference between the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones and Beyerdynamic Aventho 300?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Battery (hr): Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones 24 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 50
  • Bluetooth: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones 5.3 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 5.4
  • Codecs: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3
  • Weight (g): Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones 250 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 319

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones

Three whitelisted testers (SoundGuys, Tom's Guide, What Hi-Fi) reviewed the original 2023 QC Ultra Headphones. All three rate the ANC best-in-class, comfort excellent and sound entertaining, while flagging the $429 price. SoundGuys measured 27h37m runtime and ~87% real-world noise reduction and praised battery; Tom's Guide and What Hi-Fi call the 24h battery only decent, not class-leading. Immersive Audio splits opinion. (3 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Class-leading active noise cancelling; Comfortable, lightweight foldable design; Rich, entertaining sound quality.

Flagged: High $429 price versus rivals; Only-decent 24h battery, not class-leading; No USB-C wired audio listening.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 300

Two whitelisted testers reviewed the exact Aventho 300: SoundGuys (lab-measured, 6.7/10) and What Hi-Fi (hands-on, 4/5 stars). Both praise the long 50-plus-hour battery, the build and the feature set, and both flag mediocre ANC that trails class leaders like Bose. They diverge on sound: SoundGuys measures over-emphasized bass and harsh treble and gives a poor 2.5/5 MDAQS score, while What Hi-Fi hears a clean, even-handed signature that simply lacks the dynamism of rivals like the Dali IO-8. SoundGuys is far harsher on value and comfort; What Hi-Fi calls them solid performers for the money. No other whitelisted outlet had a fetchable review. (2 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Exceptional battery life (50-plus hours rated, ~65h measured with ANC) plus fast charging; Premium build quality with foldable metal frame/hinges (SoundGuys also praises the hardcover case); Strong connectivity and features: Bluetooth 5.4, aptX Lossless/Adaptive, multipoint, Dolby Atmos, custom EQ.

Flagged: Mediocre ANC that trails class leaders like Bose; Sound isn't class-leading: SoundGuys flags over-emphasized bass and harsh treble (2.5/5 MDAQS), What Hi-Fi finds less dynamic contrast than the Dali IO-8; Comfort issues from the 319g weight, stiff pads, clamping force and heat build-up (SoundGuys).

← All over ear headphones compared · Open data