Best Over Ear Headphones · head-to-head

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones is cheaper at $359. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones or Beyerdynamic Aventho 300?

The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones is the cheaper at $359. The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones Beyerdynamic Aventho 300
US price $359 $399
BrandBoseBeyerdynamic
Released2023-102024
ANC Yes Yes
Driver (mm)
Battery hr 24 50
Bluetooth 5.3 5.4
Codecs SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3
Wired option Yes Yes
Weight (g) 250 319
Release 2023-10 2024

Sources — Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones: headphonecheck.com (verified 2026-06-15). Beyerdynamic Aventho 300: north-america.beyerdynamic.com (verified 2026-06-15).

What's the difference between the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones and Beyerdynamic Aventho 300?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Battery hr: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones 24 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 50
  • Bluetooth: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones 5.3 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 5.4
  • Codecs: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3
  • Weight (g): Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones 250 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 319

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones

Three whitelisted testers (SoundGuys, Tom's Guide, What Hi-Fi) reviewed the original 2023 QC Ultra Headphones. All three rate the ANC best-in-class, comfort excellent and sound entertaining, while flagging the $429 price. SoundGuys measured 27h37m runtime and ~87% real-world noise reduction and praised battery; Tom's Guide and What Hi-Fi call the 24h battery only decent, not class-leading. Immersive Audio splits opinion. (3 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Class-leading active noise cancelling; Comfortable, lightweight foldable design; Rich, entertaining sound quality.

Flagged: High $429 price versus rivals; Only-decent 24h battery, not class-leading; No USB-C wired audio listening.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 300

Two whitelisted testers reviewed the exact Aventho 300: SoundGuys (lab-measured, 6.7/10) and What Hi-Fi (hands-on, 4/5 stars). Both praise the long 50-plus-hour battery, the build and the feature set, and both flag mediocre ANC that trails class leaders like Bose. They diverge on sound: SoundGuys measures over-emphasized bass and harsh treble and gives a poor 2.5/5 MDAQS score, while What Hi-Fi hears a clean, even-handed signature that simply lacks the dynamism of rivals like the Dali IO-8. SoundGuys is far harsher on value and comfort; What Hi-Fi calls them solid performers for the money. No other whitelisted outlet had a fetchable review. (2 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Exceptional battery life (50-plus hours rated, ~65h measured with ANC) plus fast charging; Premium build quality with foldable metal frame/hinges (SoundGuys also praises the hardcover case); Strong connectivity and features: Bluetooth 5.4, aptX Lossless/Adaptive, multipoint, Dolby Atmos, custom EQ.

Flagged: Mediocre ANC that trails class leaders like Bose; Sound isn't class-leading: SoundGuys flags over-emphasized bass and harsh treble (2.5/5 MDAQS), What Hi-Fi finds less dynamic contrast than the Dali IO-8; Comfort issues from the 319g weight, stiff pads, clamping force and heat build-up (SoundGuys).

← All over ear headphones compared · Open data