Bowers & Wilkins
Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3
$449
Released 2025-04
Best Over Ear Headphones · head-to-head
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 is cheaper at $399. Every spec and price links to its source.
Bowers & Wilkins
$449
Released 2025-04
Beyerdynamic
$399Cheaper
Released 2024
The Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 is the cheaper at $399. Get the Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 for the stronger spec sheet, the Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 to spend less.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | | |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $449 | $399 |
| Brand | Bowers & Wilkins | Beyerdynamic |
| Released | 2025-04 | 2024 |
| ANC | Yes | Yes |
| Driver (mm) | — | — |
| Battery hr | 30 | 50 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Codecs | SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3 |
| Wired option | Yes | Yes |
| Weight (g) | 300 | 319 |
| Release | 2025-04 | 2024 |
Sources — Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3: headphonecheck.com (verified 2026-06-15). Beyerdynamic Aventho 300: north-america.beyerdynamic.com (verified 2026-06-15).
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
All four whitelisted reviews of the exact Px7 S3 (SoundGuys, What Hi-Fi, TechRadar, Engadget) survived verification; every quote and the single measured figure were confirmed as literal text, none dropped. All four praise the premium build and comfortable, lighter 300g fit, and all agree the reworked ANC is improved but still trails Bose. Only SoundGuys published lab data (an average 83-84% reduction in perceived loudness); the other three are qualitative listening reviews. (4 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Premium build quality and refined, handsome design; Comfortable, lighter 300g fit; Detailed, dynamic and entertaining sound quality.
Flagged: ANC improved but still not class-leading; trails Bose; Limited/basic feature set; spatial audio missing at launch; Price has crept upward / expensive for the category.
Two whitelisted testers reviewed the exact Aventho 300: SoundGuys (lab-measured, 6.7/10) and What Hi-Fi (hands-on, 4/5 stars). Both praise the long 50-plus-hour battery, the build and the feature set, and both flag mediocre ANC that trails class leaders like Bose. They diverge on sound: SoundGuys measures over-emphasized bass and harsh treble and gives a poor 2.5/5 MDAQS score, while What Hi-Fi hears a clean, even-handed signature that simply lacks the dynamism of rivals like the Dali IO-8. SoundGuys is far harsher on value and comfort; What Hi-Fi calls them solid performers for the money. No other whitelisted outlet had a fetchable review. (2 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Exceptional battery life (50-plus hours rated, ~65h measured with ANC) plus fast charging; Premium build quality with foldable metal frame/hinges (SoundGuys also praises the hardcover case); Strong connectivity and features: Bluetooth 5.4, aptX Lossless/Adaptive, multipoint, Dolby Atmos, custom EQ.
Flagged: Mediocre ANC that trails class leaders like Bose; Sound isn't class-leading: SoundGuys flags over-emphasized bass and harsh treble (2.5/5 MDAQS), What Hi-Fi finds less dynamic contrast than the Dali IO-8; Comfort issues from the 319g weight, stiff pads, clamping force and heat build-up (SoundGuys).