Best Over Ear Headphones · head-to-head

Sony WH-1000XM6 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 is cheaper at $399. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Sony WH-1000XM6 or Beyerdynamic Aventho 300?

The Sony WH-1000XM6 wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Sony WH-1000XM6 Beyerdynamic Aventho 300
US price $399
BrandSonyBeyerdynamic
Released2025-052024
ANC Yes Yes
Driver (mm) 30
Battery hr 30 50
Bluetooth 5.3 5.4
Codecs SBC, AAC, LDAC, LC3 AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3
Wired option Yes Yes
Weight (g) 254 319
Release 2025-05 2024

Sources — Sony WH-1000XM6: headphonecheck.com (verified 2026-06-15). Beyerdynamic Aventho 300: north-america.beyerdynamic.com (verified 2026-06-15).

What's the difference between the Sony WH-1000XM6 and Beyerdynamic Aventho 300?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Battery hr: Sony WH-1000XM6 30 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 50
  • Bluetooth: Sony WH-1000XM6 5.3 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 5.4
  • Codecs: Sony WH-1000XM6 SBC, AAC, LDAC, LC3 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 AAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3
  • Weight (g): Sony WH-1000XM6 254 vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 319

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Sony WH-1000XM6

Three whitelisted testers (SoundGuys, What Hi-Fi, Tom's Guide) rate the WH-1000XM6 a strong flagship. SoundGuys (5-day test) logged 37 hours 14 minutes of battery with ANC and a 4.8/5 MDAQS score, praising excellent ANC, sound and microphone but flagging thin pads and no USB-C audio. What Hi-Fi (Awards 2025 winner, five stars) calls it the best-sounding Sony flagship with class-leading calls and rates comfort a full 5/5. Tom's Guide's 3-months-later follow-up is the outlier, judging the Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3 better-sounding and the Bose QC Ultra better at blocking noise, and calling the build cheap-feeling for $449. Reviewers split on comfort, value and how much the XM6 improves on the XM5. (3 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Excellent, refined active noise cancellation; Best-sounding Sony WH-1000X flagship to date; Class-leading call/microphone quality.

Flagged: Comfort compromises: thin pads, ANC mic can rub the ear, headband pressure point; No USB-C audio / lack of cutting-edge connectivity; ANC gains over the XM5 feel marginal; Bose still blocks more noise (Tom's Guide).

Beyerdynamic Aventho 300

Two whitelisted testers reviewed the exact Aventho 300: SoundGuys (lab-measured, 6.7/10) and What Hi-Fi (hands-on, 4/5 stars). Both praise the long 50-plus-hour battery, the build and the feature set, and both flag mediocre ANC that trails class leaders like Bose. They diverge on sound: SoundGuys measures over-emphasized bass and harsh treble and gives a poor 2.5/5 MDAQS score, while What Hi-Fi hears a clean, even-handed signature that simply lacks the dynamism of rivals like the Dali IO-8. SoundGuys is far harsher on value and comfort; What Hi-Fi calls them solid performers for the money. No other whitelisted outlet had a fetchable review. (2 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Exceptional battery life (50-plus hours rated, ~65h measured with ANC) plus fast charging; Premium build quality with foldable metal frame/hinges (SoundGuys also praises the hardcover case); Strong connectivity and features: Bluetooth 5.4, aptX Lossless/Adaptive, multipoint, Dolby Atmos, custom EQ.

Flagged: Mediocre ANC that trails class leaders like Bose; Sound isn't class-leading: SoundGuys flags over-emphasized bass and harsh treble (2.5/5 MDAQS), What Hi-Fi finds less dynamic contrast than the Dali IO-8; Comfort issues from the 319g weight, stiff pads, clamping force and heat build-up (SoundGuys).

← All over ear headphones compared · Open data