LG
LG LP1419IVSM
$699
Released 2019
Best Portable Air Conditioners · head-to-head
LG LP1419IVSM vs Whynter ARC-14S
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Whynter ARC-14S is cheaper at $499. Every spec and price links to its source.
Whynter
Whynter ARC-14S
$499Cheaper
Which is better: the LG LP1419IVSM or Whynter ARC-14S?
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Whynter ARC-14S is the cheaper at $499.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | LG LP1419IVSM | Whynter ARC-14S |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $699 | $499 |
| Brand | LG | Whynter |
| Released | 2019 | — |
| Cooling btu ashrae | 14000 | 14000 |
| Cooling btu sacc | 10000 | 9500 |
| Coverage (sq ft) | 500 | 500 |
| Hose config | single | dual |
| Heat mode | No | No |
| Smart Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Noise dba | 53 | 56 |
| Release | 2019 | — |
Sources — LG LP1419IVSM: lg.com (verified 2026-06-19). Whynter ARC-14S: amazon.com (verified 2026-06-19).
What's the difference between the LG LP1419IVSM and Whynter ARC-14S?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Cooling btu sacc: LG LP1419IVSM 10000 vs Whynter ARC-14S 9500
- Hose config: LG LP1419IVSM single vs Whynter ARC-14S dual
- Smart Wi-Fi: LG LP1419IVSM true vs Whynter ARC-14S false
- Noise dba: LG LP1419IVSM 53 vs Whynter ARC-14S 56
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
LG LP1419IVSM
Only one whitelisted tester, Reviewed (USA Today), published a hands-on write-up of this exact LG model. Reviewed names it Best Portable AC with Smart Functions, praising fast whole-room cooling, quiet operation, easy room-to-room movement and its ThinQ app, while flagging a flimsy filter cover and a build that is not the most robust of the units tested. (1 sourced review.)
Praised: Among the best at cooling the test space; cools a whole room fast; Strong smart features (ThinQ app, Google Assistant/Alexa voice control); Easily movable room to room with good maneuverability.
Flagged: Filter cover feels flimsy, making removal and replacement fiddly; Not the most robust build among the units tested.
Whynter ARC-14S
Only one whitelisted hands-on tester, Reviewed (USA Today), yielded a verifiable review of the exact ARC-14S. In its 200-sq-ft lab chamber it dropped temperature 22°F in 20 minutes and praised the eco-friendly parts (CFC-free refrigerant, RoHS lead-free components), but flagged weak portability (last place, no handles to grip) and slow whole-room cooling (outer sensors needed roughly another 20 minutes to reach maintenance temperature). All three quotes and the measured cooling value were verified as literal matches in the fetched article. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Decent cooling performance — lab test dropped temp 22°F in 20 minutes; Eco-friendly parts (CFC-free refrigerant, RoHS lead-free components).
Flagged: Poor portability — finished bottom of the pack, no handles to grip; Slow to cool a whole room (outer sensors took ~40 min total to reach maintenance temp).