Arzopa
Arzopa A1 Gamut
$129.99Cheaper
Released 2022
Best Portable Monitors · head-to-head
Arzopa A1 Gamut vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Arzopa A1 Gamut is cheaper at $129.99. Every spec and price links to its source.
LG
LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)
$299.99
Released 2023
Which is better: the Arzopa A1 Gamut or LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)?
The Arzopa A1 Gamut wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Arzopa A1 Gamut is the cheaper at $129.99. The Arzopa A1 Gamut both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Arzopa A1 Gamut | LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $129.99 | $299.99 |
| Brand | Arzopa | LG |
| Released | 2022 | 2023 |
| Size (in) | 15.6 | 16 |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 2560x1600 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh (Hz) | 60 | 60 |
| Ports | 1x USB-C, 1x Mini-HDMI | 2x USB-C (DP Alt Mode) |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Weight (lb) | 1.7 | 2.18 |
| Release | 2022 | 2023 |
Sources — Arzopa A1 Gamut: newegg.com (verified 2026-06-15). LG gram+view 16 (16MR70): newegg.com (verified 2026-06-15).
What's the difference between the Arzopa A1 Gamut and LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Size (in): Arzopa A1 Gamut 15.6 vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 16
- Resolution: Arzopa A1 Gamut 1920x1080 vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 2560x1600
- Ports: Arzopa A1 Gamut 1x USB-C, 1x Mini-HDMI vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 2x USB-C (DP Alt Mode)
- Weight (lb): Arzopa A1 Gamut 1.7 vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 2.18
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Arzopa A1 Gamut
Only one whitelisted tester, PCWorld, hands-on reviewed this exact Arzopa A1 Gamut. It measured a bright 297-nit panel with an on-target 2.2 gamma, near-ideal 6600K color temperature, and 97% sRGB / 74% DCI-P3 coverage, but flagged a mediocre 880:1 contrast, awful speakers, and bare-bones image controls. A solid budget pick. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Bright, usable display measured at 297 nits with accurate gamma (2.2) and near-ideal 6600K color temperature; Sturdy build with a nice bundled magnetic faux-leather cover that doubles as a stand; Generous connectivity: two USB-C (DP Alt Mode) plus Mini-HDMI, with all required cables included.
Flagged: Mediocre measured contrast (880:1) leaves dark scenes looking flat and hazy; Built-in speakers are 'rather awful'; Bare-bones menu with no color temperature, gamma, or preset adjustments; stand only tilts and lacks VESA.
LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)
Only one whitelisted outlet, TechRadar, covers the exact 16MR70, and only as a curated buying-guide blurb that defers its full lab review to non-whitelisted sister site ITPro. It praises the clear 16:10 IPS picture, the light 1.45lb build and easy two-USB-C setup, but flags the high price and weak fit for photo/design color work, noting brightness is only about average (~350 nits). RTINGS, Notebookcheck and Tom's Hardware published no hands-on review. (1 sourced review.)
Praised: Clear, good-quality 16:10 IPS picture; Lightweight and slim at 1.45lb, travel-friendly; Simple to set up and use via two USB-C ports.
Flagged: Priced high for a portable monitor; Not ideal for photo editing / design work; Brightness only about average (~350 nits).