Dell
Dell P1424H
$359.99
Released 2022
Best Portable Monitors · head-to-head
Dell P1424H vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) is cheaper at $299.99. Every spec and price links to its source.
LG
LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)
$299.99Cheaper
Released 2023
Which is better: the Dell P1424H or LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)?
The Dell P1424H wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) is the cheaper at $299.99. Get the Dell P1424H for the stronger spec sheet, the LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) to spend less.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Dell P1424H | LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $359.99 | $299.99 |
| Brand | Dell | LG |
| Released | 2022 | 2023 |
| Size (in) | 14 | 16 |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 2560x1600 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh (Hz) | 60 | 60 |
| Ports | 2x USB-C (with power pass-through) | 2x USB-C (DP Alt Mode) |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Weight (lb) | 1.3 | 2.18 |
| Release | 2022 | 2023 |
Sources — Dell P1424H: newegg.com (verified 2026-06-15). LG gram+view 16 (16MR70): newegg.com (verified 2026-06-15).
What's the difference between the Dell P1424H and LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Size (in): Dell P1424H 14 vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 16
- Resolution: Dell P1424H 1920x1080 vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 2560x1600
- Ports: Dell P1424H 2x USB-C (with power pass-through) vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 2x USB-C (DP Alt Mode)
- Weight (lb): Dell P1424H 1.3 vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 2.18
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Dell P1424H
No sourced tester review yet.
LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)
Only one whitelisted outlet, TechRadar, covers the exact 16MR70, and only as a curated buying-guide blurb that defers its full lab review to non-whitelisted sister site ITPro. It praises the clear 16:10 IPS picture, the light 1.45lb build and easy two-USB-C setup, but flags the high price and weak fit for photo/design color work, noting brightness is only about average (~350 nits). RTINGS, Notebookcheck and Tom's Hardware published no hands-on review. (1 sourced review.)
Praised: Clear, good-quality 16:10 IPS picture; Lightweight and slim at 1.45lb, travel-friendly; Simple to set up and use via two USB-C ports.
Flagged: Priced high for a portable monitor; Not ideal for photo editing / design work; Brightness only about average (~350 nits).