Best Portable Monitors · head-to-head

ViewSonic VG1655 vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. ViewSonic VG1655 is cheaper at $179. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the ViewSonic VG1655 or LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)?

The ViewSonic VG1655 wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The ViewSonic VG1655 is the cheaper at $179. The ViewSonic VG1655 both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec ViewSonic VG1655 LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)
US price $179 $299.99
BrandViewSonicLG
Released20212023
Size (in) 15.6 16
Resolution 1920x1080 2560x1600
Panel type IPS IPS
Refresh (Hz) 60 60
Ports 2x USB-C (60W 2-way powered), 1x Mini-HDMI, 1x headphone jack 2x USB-C (DP Alt Mode)
Touchscreen No No
Weight (lb) 1.8 2.18
Release 2021 2023

Sources — ViewSonic VG1655: laptopmag.com (verified 2026-06-15). LG gram+view 16 (16MR70): newegg.com (verified 2026-06-15).

What's the difference between the ViewSonic VG1655 and LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Size (in): ViewSonic VG1655 15.6 vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 16
  • Resolution: ViewSonic VG1655 1920x1080 vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 2560x1600
  • Ports: ViewSonic VG1655 2x USB-C (60W 2-way powered), 1x Mini-HDMI, 1x headphone jack vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 2x USB-C (DP Alt Mode)
  • Weight (lb): ViewSonic VG1655 1.8 vs LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 2.18

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

ViewSonic VG1655

No sourced tester review yet.

LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)

Only one whitelisted outlet, TechRadar, covers the exact 16MR70, and only as a curated buying-guide blurb that defers its full lab review to non-whitelisted sister site ITPro. It praises the clear 16:10 IPS picture, the light 1.45lb build and easy two-USB-C setup, but flags the high price and weak fit for photo/design color work, noting brightness is only about average (~350 nits). RTINGS, Notebookcheck and Tom's Hardware published no hands-on review. (1 sourced review.)

Praised: Clear, good-quality 16:10 IPS picture; Lightweight and slim at 1.45lb, travel-friendly; Simple to set up and use via two USB-C ports.

Flagged: Priced high for a portable monitor; Not ideal for photo editing / design work; Brightness only about average (~350 nits).

← All portable monitors compared · Open data