Sonos
Sonos Roam 2
$179Cheaper
Released 2024-05
Best Portable Speakers · head-to-head
Sonos Roam 2 vs Marshall Emberton III
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Sonos Roam 2 is cheaper at $179. Every spec and price links to its source.
Marshall
Marshall Emberton III
$179.99
Released 2023
Which is better: the Sonos Roam 2 or Marshall Emberton III?
The Sonos Roam 2 wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Sonos Roam 2 is the cheaper at $179. The Sonos Roam 2 both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Sonos Roam 2 | Marshall Emberton III |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $179 | $179.99 |
| Brand | Sonos | Marshall |
| Released | 2024-05 | 2023 |
| Battery hr | 10 | 32 |
| IP rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Drivers | 1 tweeter + 1 midwoofer | 2×2-inch full-range + 2 passive radiators |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Weight (lb) | 0.95 | 1.48 |
| Stereo pairing | Yes | Yes |
| Aux (in) | No | No |
| Release | 2024-05 | 2023 |
Sources — Sonos Roam 2: sonos.com (verified 2026-06-15). Marshall Emberton III: marshall.com (verified 2026-06-15).
What's the difference between the Sonos Roam 2 and Marshall Emberton III?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Battery hr: Sonos Roam 2 10 vs Marshall Emberton III 32
- Drivers: Sonos Roam 2 1 tweeter + 1 midwoofer vs Marshall Emberton III 2×2-inch full-range + 2 passive radiators
- Bluetooth: Sonos Roam 2 5.2 vs Marshall Emberton III 5.3
- Weight (lb): Sonos Roam 2 0.95 vs Marshall Emberton III 1.48
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Sonos Roam 2
No sourced tester review yet.
Marshall Emberton III
Two whitelisted outlets (Tom's Guide, TechRadar) hands-on tested the Emberton III over several weeks. Both praise class-leading battery life (30-32 hours vs a ~20-hour category norm), the rugged Marshall-amp styling, and impressively loud, punchy sound for the small size. Both flag the same core limitation: mids get de-emphasized and the sound turns harsh with bass distortion when pushed loud, plus there is no custom EQ (only three fixed presets) and no aux input. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Exceptional battery life (30-32 hours, far beyond category norm); Rugged, distinctive Marshall-amp design and build; Impressively loud and punchy sound for its small size.
Flagged: Weak/scooped mid-range; sound harshens and bass distorts at high volume; No customizable EQ (only three fixed presets); No 3.5mm aux input.