WD
WD My Passport SSD (2022)
$100Cheaper
Released 2022
Best Portable Ssds · head-to-head
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. WD My Passport SSD (2022) is cheaper at $100. Every spec and price links to its source.
WD
$100Cheaper
Released 2022
LaCie
$200
Released 2019
The LaCie Rugged SSD Pro wins 3 of the 3 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The WD My Passport SSD (2022) is the cheaper at $100. Get the LaCie Rugged SSD Pro for the stronger spec sheet, the WD My Passport SSD (2022) to spend less.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | | |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $100 | $200 |
| Brand | WD | LaCie |
| Released | 2022 | 2019 |
| Capacity (GB) | 500 | 1000 |
| Read (Mbps) | 1050 | 2800 |
| Write (Mbps) | 1000 | 2300 |
| Interface | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) | Thunderbolt 3 / USB-C |
| Encryption | AES 256-bit hardware | — |
| IP rating | — | IP67 |
| Weight (g) | — | 100 |
| Release | 2022 | 2019 |
Sources — WD My Passport SSD (2022): newegg.com (verified 2026-06-15). LaCie Rugged SSD Pro: seagate.com (verified 2026-06-15).
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Two whitelisted labs benchmarked the WD My Passport SSD NVMe (1,050/1,000 MB/s, USB 3.2 Gen 2, DRAM-less Blue SN550E): Tom's Hardware (Feb 2021) and StorageReview (Sep 2020). Both call it slim, secure and fast in real-world use but note it falls ~200 MB/s short of its rated speeds and, being DRAM-less, lags DRAM-based rivals like the Crucial X8 in file-copy/moderate-dataset tests. Tom's found a small 12GB SLC cache that drops sustained writes to ~710 MBps once saturated, though the drive stays cool (45C surface). (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Slim, light, pocketable design with AES-256 hardware encryption and 5-year warranty; Fast large-file read-back and solid real-world portable-SSD performance; Runs cool under sustained load (45C surface).
Flagged: DRAM-less design; falls behind DRAM-based rivals (Crucial X8) and lags in file-copy tests; Fell short of WD's rated 1,050/1,000 MB/s in real benchmarks (~200 MB/s under); Small SLC cache (12GB) drops sustained write to ~710 MBps once saturated.
Only one whitelisted outlet (Tom's Hardware) has a hands-on, benchmarked review of this exact Thunderbolt 3 model. It rates the drive fast and cool-running with a rugged IP67 build, but flags a small SLC write cache, a steep price (about twice a typical 10 Gbps SSD), and the lack of AES hardware encryption found on the cheaper non-Pro Rugged SSD. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Competitive Thunderbolt 3 speed: ATTO ~2,450/2,130 MB/s read/write, peaking near 2.8/2.4 GB/s in iometer; Runs cool and avoids thermal throttling under sustained load, unlike the Samsung X5; Rugged IP67 build (3m drop, car-crush rated) with 5-year warranty plus Rescue data-recovery service.
Flagged: Small SLC write cache: sustained writes fall from ~2.1 GB/s to ~1.1 GB/s after roughly 25GB; Very expensive, about twice the cost of most 10 Gbps portable SSDs; Lacks 256-bit AES hardware encryption that the cheaper non-Pro Rugged SSD includes.