Anker
Anker Prime Power Bank 26,250mAh 300W (A110A)
$229.99
Released 2024
Best Power Banks · head-to-head
Anker Prime Power Bank 26,250mAh 300W (A110A) vs Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W is cheaper at $169. Every spec and price links to its source.
Shargeek
Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W
$169Cheaper
Released 2023
Which is better: the Anker Prime Power Bank 26,250mAh 300W (A110A) or Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W?
The Anker Prime Power Bank 26,250mAh 300W (A110A) wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W is the cheaper at $169. Get the Anker Prime Power Bank 26,250mAh 300W (A110A) for the stronger spec sheet, the Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W to spend less.
See Anker Prime Power Bank 26,250mAh 300W (A110A) on Amazon Check Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W price
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Key specs, head to head
The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Anker Prime Power Bank 26,250mAh 300W (A110A) | Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $229.99 | $169 |
| Brand | Anker | Shargeek |
| Released | 2024 | 2023 |
| Capacity (mAh) | 26250 | 20000 |
| Max output (W) | 300 | 130 |
| Ports | 2x USB-C (140W each), 1x USB-A (22.5W) | 1x USB-C (100W), 1x USB-A (30W) |
| Built in cable | No | No |
| Display | touchscreen | IPS |
| Weight (oz) | 21.2 | — |
| Pass through | Yes | Yes |
| Release | 2024 | 2023 |
Sources — Anker Prime Power Bank 26,250mAh 300W (A110A): newegg.com (verified 2026-06-15). Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W: amazon.com (verified 2026-06-15).
What's the difference between the Anker Prime Power Bank 26,250mAh 300W (A110A) and Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Capacity (mAh): Anker Prime Power Bank 26,250mAh 300W (A110A) 26250 vs Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W 20000
- Max output (W): Anker Prime Power Bank 26,250mAh 300W (A110A) 300 vs Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W 130
- Ports: Anker Prime Power Bank 26,250mAh 300W (A110A) 2x USB-C (140W each), 1x USB-A (22.5W) vs Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W 1x USB-C (100W), 1x USB-A (30W)
- Display: Anker Prime Power Bank 26,250mAh 300W (A110A) touchscreen vs Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W IPS
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Anker Prime Power Bank 26,250mAh 300W (A110A)
Only Engadget's hands-on lab testing (Amy Skorheim) could be verified for this exact A110A model; the other whitelisted outlets offered no fetchable hands-on review. Engadget names it the best premium laptop power bank, praising record-fast charging and a compact, airline-legal 26,250mAh design, but flags its high price. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Fastest laptop-charging speed of any bank Engadget has tested (MacBook Pro 10-75% in about 45 min); More compact than most 27,000mAh rivals while hitting max airline-legal capacity; Useful onboard display showing charge level and a temperature gauge.
Flagged: Expensive, especially with the $110 optional charging base (over $300 for the full set); Bluetooth app monitoring is more of a fun novelty than practical; Full 140W-per-port / 300W combined output is rarely usable since most devices draw far less.
Shargeek Storm 2 Slim Power Bank 20,000mAh 130W
Only one whitelisted tester (Notebookcheck) hands-on-reviewed this exact model; mainstream outlets like PCMag, Tom's Guide and Wirecutter never covered it. Notebookcheck found the Slim charged a 100W ultrabook as expected and praised the see-through design, but flagged early milky discoloration of the clear shell and sub-rated phone charging (~35W to an S22 Ultra). (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Charges a 100W ultrabook as expected, with charging curves comparable to similar-spec rivals; Distinctive see-through design plus IPS info screen; more travel-friendly than the metallic Chargeasap Flash Pro; USB-A port reliably handles anything thrown at it.
Flagged: Clear polycarbonate shell developed faint milky discoloration streaks early in testing; Charged a Galaxy S22 Ultra only ~35W (below its 45W rate) and cannot fully fill a laptop to 100%; On-screen temperature and charging readouts did not match FLIR imaging or a USB multimeter.