Sun Joe
Sun Joe SPX3000
$169Cheaper
Best Pressure Washers · head-to-head
Sun Joe SPX3000 vs Active 2.0
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Sun Joe SPX3000 is cheaper at $169. Every spec and price links to its source.
Active Products Inc.
Active 2.0
$319.99
Released 2022
Which is better: the Sun Joe SPX3000 or Active 2.0?
The Active 2.0 wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Sun Joe SPX3000 is the cheaper at $169. Get the Active 2.0 for the stronger spec sheet, the Sun Joe SPX3000 to spend less.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Sun Joe SPX3000 | Active 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $169 | $319.99 |
| Brand | Sun Joe | Active Products Inc. |
| Released | — | 2022 |
| Power type | electric | electric |
| Max (psi) | 2030 | 1800 |
| Max flow gpm | 1.2 | 2 |
| Motor or engine | 13-amp universal | 14-amp (1800W) universal 9650 motor, 5-piston pump |
| Hose length (ft) | 20 | 20 |
| Nozzle count | 5 | 4 |
| Weight (lb) | 24.3 | 24 |
| Release | — | 2022 |
Sources — Sun Joe SPX3000: pressurewasherdb.com (verified 2026-06-15). Active 2.0: activeproducts.com (verified 2026-06-15).
What's the difference between the Sun Joe SPX3000 and Active 2.0?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Max (psi): Sun Joe SPX3000 2030 vs Active 2.0 1800
- Max flow gpm: Sun Joe SPX3000 1.2 vs Active 2.0 2
- Motor or engine: Sun Joe SPX3000 13-amp universal vs Active 2.0 14-amp (1800W) universal 9650 motor, 5-piston pump
- Nozzle count: Sun Joe SPX3000 5 vs Active 2.0 4
- Weight (lb): Sun Joe SPX3000 24.3 vs Active 2.0 24
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Sun Joe SPX3000
Wirecutter is the only whitelisted tester with a genuine hands-on review of the exact SPX3000; it names it a budget pick, praising effective cleaning, a tall easy-grab handle, and dual detergent tanks, while flagging a tippy tall body, a short 20-foot hose, a missing rotary nozzle, and an awkward hose inlet. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Cleans effectively for a good price; Pressure-gauge readings higher than the Westinghouse and runner-up DeWalt picks; Tall handle is easy to grab for those with limited mobility.
Flagged: Tall, narrow body is unstable and tippy; Short 20-foot hose vs 25-foot on the other picks; Lacks the now-standard general-use rotary nozzle.
Active 2.0
No sourced tester review yet.