Festool
Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ
$649
Best Random Orbital Sanders · head-to-head
Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ vs Makita BO5041K
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Makita BO5041K is cheaper at $149. Every spec and price links to its source.
Makita
Makita BO5041K
$149Cheaper
Which is better: the Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ or Makita BO5041K?
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Makita BO5041K is the cheaper at $149.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ | Makita BO5041K |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $649 | $149 |
| Brand | Festool | Makita |
| Released | — | — |
| Power source | corded | corded |
| Pad diameter (in) | 6 | 5 |
| Orbit diameter (mm) | 5 | — |
| Oscillations per minute max | 10000 | 12000 |
| Variable speed | Yes | Yes |
| Amperage | — | 3 |
| Voltage | — | — |
| Dust collection type | vacuum-port | bag-and-port |
| Weight (lb) | 2.6 | — |
| Vibration ms2 | — | — |
| Noise level (dB) | — | — |
Sources — Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ: festoolusa.com (verified 2026-07-11). Makita BO5041K: makitatools.com (verified 2026-07-11).
What's the difference between the Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ and Makita BO5041K?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (3 of 11). Matching specs are omitted.
- Pad diameter (in): Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ 6 vs Makita BO5041K 5
- Oscillations per minute max: Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ 10000 vs Makita BO5041K 12000
- Dust collection type: Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ vacuum-port vs Makita BO5041K bag-and-port
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ
One whitelisted hands-on review — Pro Tool Reviews' month-long shop test — covers this exact model (the reviewer explicitly puts the ETS EC 150/5 through real furniture work). It scores the tool 9.8/10, praising electronic vibration control, smoothness rivaling pneumatic Dynabrade sanders, powerful Multi-Jetstream dust extraction and the instant pad brake, faulting only the absence of a variable-speed paddle and noticeable added weight on vertical surfaces. No lab measurements were reported. (1 sourced review.)
Praised: Electronic vibration control makes a world of difference; as smooth as pneumatic Dynabrade sanders over a full day with no hand numbness; Powerful Multi-Jetstream dust extraction — suction strong enough to stick the sander to a vertical surface; Instant pad brake stops the pad the moment you power off, so you can set it down without leaving swirl scratches.
Flagged: No variable-speed paddle like a pneumatic sander — speed adjusts only via a dial; Added weight versus a pneumatic sander is noticeable on vertical surfaces.
Makita BO5041K
Only one whitelisted tester, Pro Tool Reviews, covers the exact BO5041K, and its March 2010 article is a hands-on preview rather than a measured lab test. It praises the sander's comfort, control, and long-term reliability while calling it a solid but unremarkable, non-revolutionary tool. No other whitelisted outlet reviewed this model. (1 sourced review.)
Praised: Rubberized palm grip offers ample comfort and control; Solid, reliable build expected to last a long time; Rotatable/adjustable front handle is a welcome touch on a more powerful sander.
Flagged: Evolutionary, not revolutionary — doesn't advance the category.