Best Random Orbital Sanders · head-to-head

Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ vs Porter-Cable 382

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Porter-Cable 382 is cheaper at $66.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ or Porter-Cable 382?

The Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Porter-Cable 382 is the cheaper at $66.99. Get the Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ for the stronger spec sheet, the Porter-Cable 382 to spend less.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ Porter-Cable 382
US price $649 $66.99
BrandFestoolPorter-Cable
Released
Power source corded corded
Pad diameter (in) 6 5
Orbit diameter (mm) 5
Oscillations per minute max 10000 12000
Variable speed Yes No
Amperage 1.9
Voltage
Dust collection type vacuum-port bag
Weight (lb) 2.6 3
Vibration ms2
Noise level (dB)

Sources — Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ: festoolusa.com (verified 2026-07-11). Porter-Cable 382: portercable.com (verified 2026-07-11).

What's the difference between the Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ and Porter-Cable 382?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 11). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Pad diameter (in): Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ 6 vs Porter-Cable 382 5
  • Oscillations per minute max: Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ 10000 vs Porter-Cable 382 12000
  • Variable speed: Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ true vs Porter-Cable 382 false
  • Dust collection type: Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ vacuum-port vs Porter-Cable 382 bag
  • Weight (lb): Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ 2.6 vs Porter-Cable 382 3

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Festool ETS EC 150/5 EQ

One whitelisted hands-on review — Pro Tool Reviews' month-long shop test — covers this exact model (the reviewer explicitly puts the ETS EC 150/5 through real furniture work). It scores the tool 9.8/10, praising electronic vibration control, smoothness rivaling pneumatic Dynabrade sanders, powerful Multi-Jetstream dust extraction and the instant pad brake, faulting only the absence of a variable-speed paddle and noticeable added weight on vertical surfaces. No lab measurements were reported. (1 sourced review.)

Praised: Electronic vibration control makes a world of difference; as smooth as pneumatic Dynabrade sanders over a full day with no hand numbness; Powerful Multi-Jetstream dust extraction — suction strong enough to stick the sander to a vertical surface; Instant pad brake stops the pad the moment you power off, so you can set it down without leaving swirl scratches.

Flagged: No variable-speed paddle like a pneumatic sander — speed adjusts only via a dial; Added weight versus a pneumatic sander is noticeable on vertical surfaces.

Porter-Cable 382

Only one whitelisted tester — Reviewed (USA Today) — hands-on tested the Porter-Cable 382, naming it best for dust collection. It praises near-cloudless dust capture with a shop vac and smooth, easy control (~5 min to strip a painted board), but flags the flat, uncontoured top handle as uncomfortable for long sessions. Single source; no cross-tester corroboration. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Excellent dust collection — bag lets out little dust, almost no cloud when paired with a shop vac; Smooth, easy-to-control operation good for longer sanding sessions.

Flagged: Flat, uncontoured top handle is uncomfortable to hold long-term.

← All random orbital sanders compared · Open data