Best Rooftop Tents · head-to-head

Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO vs ROAM Adventure Co The Vagabond 2.0

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO is cheaper at $3795. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO or ROAM Adventure Co The Vagabond 2.0?

The Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO ROAM Adventure Co The Vagabond 2.0
US price $3795
BrandRoofnestROAM Adventure Co
Released
Shell type hard-shell soft-shell
Sleeping capacity 2 3
Closed height (in) 8 9
Mounted footprint (in) 83 x 50 56 x 48
Sleeping area (in) 80 x 47 56 x 96
Peak interior height (in) 58 52
Mattress thickness (in) 2 2.5
Weight (lb) 140 150
Static load capacity (lb) 650
Canopy fabric poly-cotton poly-cotton
Annex included No No

Sources — Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO: offroadalliance.com (verified 2026-07-13). ROAM Adventure Co The Vagabond 2.0: roamadventureco.com (verified 2026-07-13).

What's the difference between the Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO and ROAM Adventure Co The Vagabond 2.0?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (8 of 11). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Shell type: Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO hard-shell vs ROAM Adventure Co The Vagabond 2.0 soft-shell
  • Sleeping capacity: Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO 2 vs ROAM Adventure Co The Vagabond 2.0 3
  • Closed height (in): Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO 8 vs ROAM Adventure Co The Vagabond 2.0 9
  • Mounted footprint (in): Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO 83 x 50 vs ROAM Adventure Co The Vagabond 2.0 56 x 48
  • Sleeping area (in): Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO 80 x 47 vs ROAM Adventure Co The Vagabond 2.0 56 x 96
  • Peak interior height (in): Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO 58 vs ROAM Adventure Co The Vagabond 2.0 52
  • Mattress thickness (in): Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO 2 vs ROAM Adventure Co The Vagabond 2.0 2.5
  • Weight (lb): Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO 140 vs ROAM Adventure Co The Vagabond 2.0 150

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO

Two whitelisted testers, both broadly positive; no independent lab measurements exist. GearJunkie hands-on field-tested the exact Falcon 3 EVO over a multi-week road trip, praising its slim aerodynamic shell, spacious interior, fast setup and ventilation. Switchback rates the Falcon 3 Evo Air highly but explicitly discloses it tested the prior Falcon 3, not the updated model. All cited figures are manufacturer specs. (2 sourced reviews.)

Praised: Slim, low-profile aerodynamic hardshell that cuts wind noise and drag; Spacious, tall interior (58-inch peak) despite a small footprint; Fast, near-effortless hydraulic setup in a minute or two.

Flagged: One of the pricier rooftop tents; Rear door flap flops out and can block the ladder when exiting at night; Loose webbing pack-down strap flaps and makes noise in wind.

ROAM Adventure Co The Vagabond 2.0

No sourced tester review yet.

← All rooftop tents compared · Open data