Roofnest
Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO
$3795
Best Rooftop Tents · head-to-head
Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO vs Thule Approach M
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Thule Approach M is cheaper at $2699.95. Every spec and price links to its source.
Thule
Thule Approach M
$2699.95Cheaper
Which is better: the Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO or Thule Approach M?
They split the 2 specs we compare evenly. The Thule Approach M is the cheaper at $2699.95.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO | Thule Approach M |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $3795 | $2699.95 |
| Brand | Roofnest | Thule |
| Released | — | — |
| Shell type | hard-shell | soft-shell |
| Sleeping capacity | 2 | 3 |
| Closed height (in) | 8 | 11 |
| Mounted footprint (in) | 83 x 50 | 49 x 56 in |
| Sleeping area (in) | 80 x 47 | 95 x 51 in |
| Peak interior height (in) | 58 | 40.2 |
| Mattress thickness (in) | 2 | — |
| Weight (lb) | 140 | 128 |
| Static load capacity (lb) | 650 | 660 |
| Canopy fabric | poly-cotton | polyester-ripstop |
| Annex included | No | No |
Sources — Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO: offroadalliance.com (verified 2026-07-13). Thule Approach M: thule.com (verified 2026-07-13).
What's the difference between the Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO and Thule Approach M?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (9 of 11). Matching specs are omitted.
- Shell type: Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO hard-shell vs Thule Approach M soft-shell
- Sleeping capacity: Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO 2 vs Thule Approach M 3
- Closed height (in): Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO 8 vs Thule Approach M 11
- Mounted footprint (in): Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO 83 x 50 vs Thule Approach M 49 x 56 in
- Sleeping area (in): Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO 80 x 47 vs Thule Approach M 95 x 51 in
- Peak interior height (in): Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO 58 vs Thule Approach M 40.2
- Weight (lb): Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO 140 vs Thule Approach M 128
- Static load capacity (lb): Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO 650 vs Thule Approach M 660
- Canopy fabric: Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO poly-cotton vs Thule Approach M polyester-ripstop
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Roofnest Falcon 3 EVO
Two whitelisted testers, both broadly positive; no independent lab measurements exist. GearJunkie hands-on field-tested the exact Falcon 3 EVO over a multi-week road trip, praising its slim aerodynamic shell, spacious interior, fast setup and ventilation. Switchback rates the Falcon 3 Evo Air highly but explicitly discloses it tested the prior Falcon 3, not the updated model. All cited figures are manufacturer specs. (2 sourced reviews.)
Praised: Slim, low-profile aerodynamic hardshell that cuts wind noise and drag; Spacious, tall interior (58-inch peak) despite a small footprint; Fast, near-effortless hydraulic setup in a minute or two.
Flagged: One of the pricier rooftop tents; Rear door flap flops out and can block the ladder when exiting at night; Loose webbing pack-down strap flaps and makes noise in wind.
Thule Approach M
No sourced tester review yet.