No photo yet
Brother
Brother XM2701
$149.99Cheaper
Best Sewing Machines · head-to-head
Brother XM2701 vs Juki TL-2010Q
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Brother XM2701 is cheaper at $149.99. Every spec and price links to its source.
Juki
Juki TL-2010Q
$1199
Which is better: the Brother XM2701 or Juki TL-2010Q?
The Brother XM2701 wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Brother XM2701 is the cheaper at $149.99. The Brother XM2701 both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Brother XM2701 | Juki TL-2010Q |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $149.99 | $1199 |
| Brand | Brother | Juki |
| Released | — | — |
| Built in stitches | 27 | 1 |
| Max speed spm | 800 | 1500 |
| Max stitch width (mm) | 5 | 0 |
| Max stitch length (mm) | 4 | 6 |
| Weight (lb) | 12.6 | 25.4 |
| Presser feet included | 6 | 3 |
| Buttonhole styles | 1 | 0 |
| Bobbin type | top-load | front-load |
| Automatic needle threader | Yes | Yes |
| LCD screen | No | No |
| Free arm | Yes | No |
Sources — Brother XM2701: brother-usa.com (verified 2026-06-27). Juki TL-2010Q: jukihome.com (verified 2026-06-27).
What's the difference between the Brother XM2701 and Juki TL-2010Q?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (9 of 11). Matching specs are omitted.
- Built in stitches: Brother XM2701 27 vs Juki TL-2010Q 1
- Max speed spm: Brother XM2701 800 vs Juki TL-2010Q 1500
- Max stitch width (mm): Brother XM2701 5 vs Juki TL-2010Q 0
- Max stitch length (mm): Brother XM2701 4 vs Juki TL-2010Q 6
- Weight (lb): Brother XM2701 12.6 vs Juki TL-2010Q 25.4
- Presser feet included: Brother XM2701 6 vs Juki TL-2010Q 3
- Buttonhole styles: Brother XM2701 1 vs Juki TL-2010Q 0
- Bobbin type: Brother XM2701 top-load vs Juki TL-2010Q front-load
- Free arm: Brother XM2701 true vs Juki TL-2010Q false