Oura
Oura Ring 4
$349Cheaper
Released 2024-10
Best Smart Rings · head-to-head
Oura Ring 4 vs RingConn Gen 2
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Oura Ring 4 is cheaper at $349. Every spec and price links to its source.
RingConn
RingConn Gen 2
$386
Released 2024-08
Which is better: the Oura Ring 4 or RingConn Gen 2?
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Oura Ring 4 is the cheaper at $349.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Oura Ring 4 | RingConn Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $349 | $386 |
| Brand | Oura | RingConn |
| Released | 2024-10 | 2024-08 |
| Material | Titanium (non-allergenic inner and outer surfaces) | Aerospace-grade titanium alloy with medical-grade epoxy resin inner layer |
| Weight (g) | 3.3-5.2 | 2-3 |
| Battery days | 8 | 12 |
| Spo2 | Yes | Yes |
| Temperature sensor | Yes | Yes |
| Ecg | No | No |
| Subscription required | Yes | No |
| Water resistance (m) | 100 | 100 |
Sources — Oura Ring 4: ouraring.com (verified 2026-06-15). RingConn Gen 2: ringconn.com (verified 2026-06-15).
What's the difference between the Oura Ring 4 and RingConn Gen 2?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.
- Material: Oura Ring 4 Titanium (non-allergenic inner and outer surfaces) vs RingConn Gen 2 Aerospace-grade titanium alloy with medical-grade epoxy resin inner layer
- Weight (g): Oura Ring 4 3.3-5.2 vs RingConn Gen 2 2-3
- Battery days: Oura Ring 4 8 vs RingConn Gen 2 12
- Subscription required: Oura Ring 4 true vs RingConn Gen 2 false
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Oura Ring 4
Four testers (Tom's Guide, TechRadar, Engadget, Digital Trends) all hands-on-tested the Oura Ring 4 and call it the best smart ring you can buy, praising the all-titanium comfort and companion app. Every source flags the mandatory ~$5.99/month subscription; easy scratching and step/calorie/activity-detection accuracy are the recurring doubts across reviews. (4 sourced reviews, 4 lab-tested.)
Praised: Comfortable all-titanium design with flush, recessed sensors; Excellent companion app with clear data presentation; Long real-world battery life (roughly 5.5-7 days per charge).
Flagged: Mandatory ~$5.99/month subscription to unlock most features; Step / calorie / activity-detection accuracy lags a smartwatch; Titanium surface scratches easily within weeks.
RingConn Gen 2
Two whitelisted testers hands-on reviewed the exact RingConn Gen 2 (2024, $299 titanium model, not the later Air): Digital Trends (two weeks of wear) and TechRadar (several weeks). Both praise its light, subscription-free, stylish design, first-in-class sleep apnea monitoring, and long battery life versus rival rings, but fault weak fitness tracking and shallow app analytics. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Light, comfortable, discreet titanium design that doesn't look like tech; No subscription and affordable versus Oura/Samsung; Sleep apnea monitoring (a smart-ring first).
Flagged: Weak fitness/workout tracking, no automatic activity detection, only run/walk/cycle; App analytics lack depth; you must interpret the data yourself; Real-world battery fell short of the 10-12 day claim (six to eight days measured).