Samsung
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
$1299.99
Released 2025-02
Best Smartphones · head-to-head
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Google Pixel 9 Pro
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Google Pixel 9 Pro is cheaper at $999. Every spec and price links to its source.
Google Pixel 9 Pro
$999Cheaper
Released 2024-09
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or Google Pixel 9 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra wins 3 of the 5 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 2. The Google Pixel 9 Pro is the cheaper at $999. Get the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra for the stronger spec sheet, the Google Pixel 9 Pro to spend less.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Key specs, head to head
The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Google Pixel 9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $1299.99 MSRP, 256GB (base config) | $999 MSRP, 128GB |
| Brand | Samsung | |
| Released | 2025-02 | 2024-09 |
| Display (in) | 6.9 | 6.3 |
| Display type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | LTPO OLED |
| Refresh (Hz) | 120 | 120 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | Google Tensor G4 |
| RAM (GB) | 12 | 16 |
| Storage (GB) | 256 | 128 |
| Main camera (MP) | 200 | 50 |
| Battery (mAh) | 5000 | 4700 |
| Charge (W) | 45 | 27 |
| Weight (g) | 218 | 199 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Fiveg | Yes | Yes |
Sources — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: gsmarena.com (verified 2026-06-15). Google Pixel 9 Pro: gsmarena.com (verified 2026-06-15).
What's the difference between the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Google Pixel 9 Pro?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (10 of 13). Matching specs are omitted.
- Display (in): Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 6.9 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro 6.3
- Display type: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X vs Google Pixel 9 Pro LTPO OLED
- Chipset: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4
- RAM (GB): Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 12 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro 16
- Storage (GB): Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 256 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro 128
- Main camera (MP): Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 200 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro 50
- Battery (mAh): Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro 4700
- Charge (W): Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 45 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro 27
- Weight (g): Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 218 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro 199
- OS: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Android 15 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Android 14
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Two whitelisted lab testers (Tom's Guide, GSMArena) reviewed the exact Galaxy S25 Ultra. Both praise the overclocked Snapdragon 8 Elite speed, and Tom's Guide measured strong battery endurance (17h14m). Display measurements diverge by methodology. Both flag the slow 45W charging (~59 min to full); GSMArena calls the panel solid but not cutting-edge, while Tom's Guide rates the display excellent and brighter than the iPhone 16 Pro Max. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Fast overclocked Snapdragon 8 Elite performance, one of the fastest phones tested; Excellent, bright display beating iPhone 16 Pro Max in Tom's Guide lab (1,860 nits); Strong battery endurance (17h14m Tom's Guide test).
Flagged: Slow 45W charging, ~59 minutes to full; Qi2 support lacks built-in magnets; needs a special case; Display is solid but not cutting-edge per spec / dims quickly at peak.
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Two whitelisted testers lab-benchmarked the exact 6.3-inch Pixel 9 Pro (not the Pro XL). Both praise a very bright LTPO OLED, long battery life and strong cameras, but flag the mid-tier Tensor G4 that trails rival flagships and throttles under sustained load, plus slow ~27W charging. No PCMag/Verge hands-on met the bar. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Very bright LTPO OLED display (1298 nits manual / 2016 cd/m2 full-white measured); Long battery life for a compact phone (13:11 Active Use / ~17h web surfing); Strong triple-camera image quality.
Flagged: Tensor G4 performance trails current high-end SoCs in benchmarks; Throttles heavily and runs warm (42.8 C, 67.6% stress stability) under load; Slow ~27W charging and no bundled power adapter.