Bissell
Bissell PowerFresh Scrubbing & Sanitizing Steam Mop 1940
$99.99
Best Steam Mops · head-to-head
Bissell PowerFresh Scrubbing & Sanitizing Steam Mop 1940 vs Shark Steam Pocket Mop S3501
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Bissell PowerFresh Scrubbing & Sanitizing Steam Mop 1940 is cheaper at $99.99. Every spec and price links to its source.
Shark
Shark Steam Pocket Mop S3501
$99.99
Released 2010
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Bissell PowerFresh Scrubbing & Sanitizing Steam Mop 1940 | Shark Steam Pocket Mop S3501 |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $99.99 | $99.99 MSRP per SharkNinja.com |
| Brand | Bissell | Shark |
| Released | — | 2010 |
| Tank capacity (ml) | 473 | 450 |
| Heat up time sec | 30 | 30 |
| Steam levels | 3 | 1 |
| Cord length (ft) | 23 | 18 |
| Max run time min | — | — |
| Swivel steering | Yes | Yes |
| Washable pads | Yes | Yes |
| Release | — | 2010 |
Sources — Bissell PowerFresh Scrubbing & Sanitizing Steam Mop 1940: bissell.com (verified 2026-06-20). Shark Steam Pocket Mop S3501: sharkninja.com (verified 2026-06-20).
What's the difference between the Bissell PowerFresh Scrubbing & Sanitizing Steam Mop 1940 and Shark Steam Pocket Mop S3501?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (3 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Tank capacity (ml): Bissell PowerFresh Scrubbing & Sanitizing Steam Mop 1940 473 vs Shark Steam Pocket Mop S3501 450
- Steam levels: Bissell PowerFresh Scrubbing & Sanitizing Steam Mop 1940 3 vs Shark Steam Pocket Mop S3501 1
- Cord length (ft): Bissell PowerFresh Scrubbing & Sanitizing Steam Mop 1940 23 vs Shark Steam Pocket Mop S3501 18
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Bissell PowerFresh Scrubbing & Sanitizing Steam Mop 1940
No sourced tester review yet.
Shark Steam Pocket Mop S3501
Only one whitelisted tester, Reviewed (USA Today), hands-on tested this exact Shark S3501 Steam Pocket Mop, and the verdict was negative. The reviewer praised a fast ~30-second heat-up and easy swivel steering, but flagged a frosted water window, no on/off switch, distilled-water dependence, and stains that needed repeated back-and-forth pumping, concluding it is 'more work than it needs to be.' (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Heats up fast, ready to use in about 30 seconds; Easy to maneuver with swivel steering and adjustable handle height; Long 18-foot power cord and safe on many sealed hard-floor types.
Flagged: No actual on/off switch, which is confusing at first; Frosted water window and tank are a hassle to read, fill, and drain; Requires distilled water to avoid mineral buildup, an ongoing inconvenience.