Best Stud Finders · head-to-head

Franklin Sensors ProSensor 710 Professional Stud Finder vs Zircon MultiScanner i520 OneStep Multifunction Stud Finder

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Zircon MultiScanner i520 OneStep Multifunction Stud Finder is cheaper at $49.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Franklin Sensors ProSensor 710 Professional Stud Finder or Zircon MultiScanner i520 OneStep Multifunction Stud Finder?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Zircon MultiScanner i520 OneStep Multifunction Stud Finder is the cheaper at $49.99.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Franklin Sensors ProSensor 710 Professional Stud Finder Zircon MultiScanner i520 OneStep Multifunction Stud Finder
US price $52.95 $49.99
BrandFranklin SensorsZircon
Released
Max scan depth (in) 1.6 3
Sensing technology 13 independent capacitance sensors, simultaneous multi-sensor readout capacitance (StudScan/DeepScan) + magnetic/inductive (Metal Scan) + AC field (WireWarning) with AutoCorrecting Technology (ACT)
Detects wood metal live wire wood, metal (no dedicated live-wire mode) wood studs, metal (ferrous to 3 in., non-ferrous to 1.5 in.), live AC wiring to 2 in.
Sensor array width (in) 7.25
Center vs edge find shows full stud width instantly across 13 LEDs (center and both edges simultaneously) center and edge find (4 modes: Stud Scan, DeepScan, Metal Scan, AC Scan)
Display type 13-LED array (no LCD) backlit LCD display with SpotLite laser-style pointer
Calibration method none required; press and hold to scan automatic via ACT (AutoCorrecting Technology); no manual calibration step
Power source AA batteries (not included) 9V alkaline battery (not included)

Sources — Franklin Sensors ProSensor 710 Professional Stud Finder: franklinsensors.com (verified 2026-08-05). Zircon MultiScanner i520 OneStep Multifunction Stud Finder: zircon.com (verified 2026-08-05).

What's the difference between the Franklin Sensors ProSensor 710 Professional Stud Finder and Zircon MultiScanner i520 OneStep Multifunction Stud Finder?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (7 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Max scan depth (in): Franklin Sensors ProSensor 710 Professional Stud Finder 1.6 vs Zircon MultiScanner i520 OneStep Multifunction Stud Finder 3
  • Sensing technology: Franklin Sensors ProSensor 710 Professional Stud Finder 13 independent capacitance sensors, simultaneous multi-sensor readout vs Zircon MultiScanner i520 OneStep Multifunction Stud Finder capacitance (StudScan/DeepScan) + magnetic/inductive (Metal Scan) + AC field (WireWarning) with AutoCorrecting Technology (ACT)
  • Detects wood metal live wire: Franklin Sensors ProSensor 710 Professional Stud Finder wood, metal (no dedicated live-wire mode) vs Zircon MultiScanner i520 OneStep Multifunction Stud Finder wood studs, metal (ferrous to 3 in., non-ferrous to 1.5 in.), live AC wiring to 2 in.
  • Center vs edge find: Franklin Sensors ProSensor 710 Professional Stud Finder shows full stud width instantly across 13 LEDs (center and both edges simultaneously) vs Zircon MultiScanner i520 OneStep Multifunction Stud Finder center and edge find (4 modes: Stud Scan, DeepScan, Metal Scan, AC Scan)
  • Display type: Franklin Sensors ProSensor 710 Professional Stud Finder 13-LED array (no LCD) vs Zircon MultiScanner i520 OneStep Multifunction Stud Finder backlit LCD display with SpotLite laser-style pointer
  • Calibration method: Franklin Sensors ProSensor 710 Professional Stud Finder none required; press and hold to scan vs Zircon MultiScanner i520 OneStep Multifunction Stud Finder automatic via ACT (AutoCorrecting Technology); no manual calibration step
  • Power source: Franklin Sensors ProSensor 710 Professional Stud Finder AA batteries (not included) vs Zircon MultiScanner i520 OneStep Multifunction Stud Finder 9V alkaline battery (not included)

← All stud finders compared · Open data