Best Tennis Rackets · head-to-head

Wilson Blade 98 (16x19) v9 vs Dunlop FX 500

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Wilson Blade 98 (16x19) v9 is cheaper at $249. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Wilson Blade 98 (16x19) v9 or Dunlop FX 500?

The Dunlop FX 500 wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Wilson Blade 98 (16x19) v9 is the cheaper at $249. Get the Dunlop FX 500 for the stronger spec sheet, the Wilson Blade 98 (16x19) v9 to spend less.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Wilson Blade 98 (16x19) v9 Dunlop FX 500
US price $249 $249.99
BrandWilsonDunlop
Released20242025
Head size sqin 98 100
Strung weight (oz) 11.4 11.2
Balance point (mm) 330 330
String pattern 16x19 16x19
Beam width (mm) 21/21/21 23/26/23
Stiffness ra 62 68
Grip size 4 1/8"-4 1/2" (L1-L4) 4 1/8"-4 1/2" (L1-L4)
Racket length (in) 27 27
Swingweight 324 320

Sources — Wilson Blade 98 (16x19) v9: tennis-warehouse.com (verified 2026-08-01). Dunlop FX 500: tennis-warehouse.com (verified 2026-08-01).

What's the difference between the Wilson Blade 98 (16x19) v9 and Dunlop FX 500?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 9). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Head size sqin: Wilson Blade 98 (16x19) v9 98 vs Dunlop FX 500 100
  • Strung weight (oz): Wilson Blade 98 (16x19) v9 11.4 vs Dunlop FX 500 11.2
  • Beam width (mm): Wilson Blade 98 (16x19) v9 21/21/21 vs Dunlop FX 500 23/26/23
  • Stiffness ra: Wilson Blade 98 (16x19) v9 62 vs Dunlop FX 500 68
  • Swingweight: Wilson Blade 98 (16x19) v9 324 vs Dunlop FX 500 320

← All tennis rackets compared · Open data