Wilson
Blade 98 (16x19) v9
$249
Released 2024
Best Tennis Rackets · head-to-head
Blade 98 (16x19) v9 vs TF-X1 300
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Blade 98 (16x19) v9 is cheaper at $249. Every spec and price links to its source.
Tecnifibre
TF-X1 300
—
Released 2021
Which is better: the Blade 98 (16x19) v9 or TF-X1 300?
The TF-X1 300 wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Blade 98 (16x19) v9 | TF-X1 300 |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $249 | — |
| Brand | Wilson | Tecnifibre |
| Released | 2024 | 2021 |
| Head size sqin | 98 | 100 |
| Strung weight (oz) | 11.4 | 11.1 |
| Balance point (mm) | 330 | 330 |
| String pattern | 16x19 | 16x19 |
| Beam width (mm) | 21/21/21 | 24/25/24 |
| Stiffness ra | 62 | 71 |
| Grip size | 4 1/8"-4 1/2" (L1-L4) | 4 1/8"-4 3/8" (L1-L3) |
| Racket length (in) | 27 | 27 |
| Swingweight | 324 | 323 |
Sources — Blade 98 (16x19) v9: tennis-warehouse.com (verified 2026-08-01). TF-X1 300: tennis-warehouse.com (verified 2026-08-01).
What's the difference between the Blade 98 (16x19) v9 and TF-X1 300?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (6 of 9). Matching specs are omitted.
- Head size sqin: Blade 98 (16x19) v9 98 vs TF-X1 300 100
- Strung weight (oz): Blade 98 (16x19) v9 11.4 vs TF-X1 300 11.1
- Beam width (mm): Blade 98 (16x19) v9 21/21/21 vs TF-X1 300 24/25/24
- Stiffness ra: Blade 98 (16x19) v9 62 vs TF-X1 300 71
- Grip size: Blade 98 (16x19) v9 4 1/8"-4 1/2" (L1-L4) vs TF-X1 300 4 1/8"-4 3/8" (L1-L3)
- Swingweight: Blade 98 (16x19) v9 324 vs TF-X1 300 323