Best Tens Units · head-to-head

iReliev TENS Unit Pain Relief System (ET-1313) vs AUVON Dual Channel TENS Unit (AS8012)

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. AUVON Dual Channel TENS Unit (AS8012) is cheaper at $31.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the iReliev TENS Unit Pain Relief System (ET-1313) or AUVON Dual Channel TENS Unit (AS8012)?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The AUVON Dual Channel TENS Unit (AS8012) is the cheaper at $31.99.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec iReliev TENS Unit Pain Relief System (ET-1313) AUVON Dual Channel TENS Unit (AS8012)
US price $59.95 $31.99
BrandiRelievAUVON
Released
Output channels 2 2
Intensity levels 25 20
Preset modes 8 20
Power source 3x AAA batteries rechargeable lithium battery (USB), up to 10 hrs of use
Electrode pads included 8
Timer range min up to 60 (adjustable) 10-60
Wireless No No
Fda cleared Yes Yes

Sources — iReliev TENS Unit Pain Relief System (ET-1313): medgrade.org (verified 2026-08-01). AUVON Dual Channel TENS Unit (AS8012): medgrade.org (verified 2026-08-01).

What's the difference between the iReliev TENS Unit Pain Relief System (ET-1313) and AUVON Dual Channel TENS Unit (AS8012)?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Intensity levels: iReliev TENS Unit Pain Relief System (ET-1313) 25 vs AUVON Dual Channel TENS Unit (AS8012) 20
  • Preset modes: iReliev TENS Unit Pain Relief System (ET-1313) 8 vs AUVON Dual Channel TENS Unit (AS8012) 20
  • Power source: iReliev TENS Unit Pain Relief System (ET-1313) 3x AAA batteries vs AUVON Dual Channel TENS Unit (AS8012) rechargeable lithium battery (USB), up to 10 hrs of use
  • Timer range min: iReliev TENS Unit Pain Relief System (ET-1313) up to 60 (adjustable) vs AUVON Dual Channel TENS Unit (AS8012) 10-60

← All tens units compared · Open data