NordicTrack
NordicTrack Commercial 1750
$2499
Released 2025
Best Treadmills · head-to-head
NordicTrack Commercial 1750 vs Horizon 7.0 AT
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Horizon 7.0 AT is cheaper at $1099. Every spec and price links to its source.
Horizon Fitness
Horizon 7.0 AT
$1099Cheaper
Released 2022
Which is better: the NordicTrack Commercial 1750 or Horizon 7.0 AT?
The Horizon 7.0 AT wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Horizon 7.0 AT is the cheaper at $1099. The Horizon 7.0 AT both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | NordicTrack Commercial 1750 | Horizon 7.0 AT |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $2499 | $1099 |
| Brand | NordicTrack | Horizon Fitness |
| Released | 2025 | 2022 |
| Motor hp | 4.25 | 3 |
| Max speed mph | 12 | 12 |
| Max incline pct | 12 | 15 |
| Min incline pct | -3 | 0 |
| Running deck (in) | 22 x 60 | 20 x 60 |
| Folding | Yes | Yes |
| Max user weight (lb) | 400 | 325 |
| Touchscreen (in) | 16 | — |
Sources — NordicTrack Commercial 1750: nordictrack.com (verified 2026-06-15). Horizon 7.0 AT: horizonfitness.com (verified 2026-06-15).
What's the difference between the NordicTrack Commercial 1750 and Horizon 7.0 AT?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.
- Motor hp: NordicTrack Commercial 1750 4.25 vs Horizon 7.0 AT 3
- Max incline pct: NordicTrack Commercial 1750 12 vs Horizon 7.0 AT 15
- Min incline pct: NordicTrack Commercial 1750 -3 vs Horizon 7.0 AT 0
- Running deck (in): NordicTrack Commercial 1750 22 x 60 vs Horizon 7.0 AT 20 x 60
- Max user weight (lb): NordicTrack Commercial 1750 400 vs Horizon 7.0 AT 325
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
NordicTrack Commercial 1750
Three whitelisted testers who ran on the 1750 — Garage Gym Reviews, BarBend, and Reviewed — rate it a top or near-top treadmill. All three praise the roomy cushioned deck, iFIT interactive programming with auto-adjusting speed/incline, and the rare incline-plus-decline range; all three flag its expense and iFIT-dependent value. GGR and BarBend logged decibel and button-pressure measurements; Reviewed tested it hands-on but published no instrumented numbers. (3 sourced reviews, 3 lab-tested.)
Praised: Roomy, cushioned ~60-inch deck feels comfortable and stable even during sprints; iFIT interactive programming with auto-adjusting speed and incline is the standout feature; Rare incline plus decline training (-3% to 12%) simulates outdoor hills.
Flagged: Expensive, and value hinges on a paid iFIT subscription (~$39/mo); Large, heavy footprint that is hard to move despite folding; Occasional startup jumpiness or belt feeling slippy during intervals.
Horizon 7.0 AT
Two whitelisted hands-on testers (Garage Gym Reviews, BarBend) reviewed this exact model; both recommend it as a top budget running treadmill around/under $1,000. They praise its stable, shake-free 60-inch three-zone cushioned deck, wide 12-mph/15% range via QuickDial, and easy FeatherLight folding. Gripes: no touchscreen (basic LCD only), selective app integration (not iFIT-compatible), and a heavy ~277-lb build; one BarBend tester also found the belt a little thin. No lab-instrument measurements (noise dB, verified HP) were taken. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Stable and shake-free even during runs and sprints; Long 60-inch three-zone cushioned deck, good for tall runners and joints; Strong value; best budget treadmill around/under $1,000.
Flagged: No touchscreen; only a basic LCD display; Limited/selective app integration (not iFIT-compatible; some apps only stream stats); Heavy machine (~277 lb / over 250 lb), hard to move.