Best TVs · head-to-head

LG C5 OLED 65" vs Samsung S95F OLED 65"

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. LG C5 OLED 65" is cheaper at $1399. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the LG C5 OLED 65" or Samsung S95F OLED 65"?

The Samsung S95F OLED 65" wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The LG C5 OLED 65" is the cheaper at $1399. Get the Samsung S95F OLED 65" for the stronger spec sheet, the LG C5 OLED 65" to spend less.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Key specs, head to head

The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.

Refresh (Hz)
LG C5 OLED 65" 144
Samsung S95F OLED 65" 165

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec LG C5 OLED 65" Samsung S95F OLED 65"
US price $1399 $3299
BrandLGSamsung
Released20252025
Screen (in) 65 65
Panel type OLED evo (WRGB) QD-OLED
Resolution 3840x2160 3840x2160
Refresh (Hz) 144 165
HDR formats Dolby Vision IQ, HDR10, HLG HDR10+, HDR10, HLG
HDMI 2 1 ports 4 4
Smart OS webOS 25 Tizen
Release 2025 2025

Sources — LG C5 OLED 65": newegg.com (verified 2026-06-15). Samsung S95F OLED 65": samsung.com (verified 2026-06-15).

What's the difference between the LG C5 OLED 65" and Samsung S95F OLED 65"?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Panel type: LG C5 OLED 65" OLED evo (WRGB) vs Samsung S95F OLED 65" QD-OLED
  • Refresh (Hz): LG C5 OLED 65" 144 vs Samsung S95F OLED 65" 165
  • HDR formats: LG C5 OLED 65" Dolby Vision IQ, HDR10, HLG vs Samsung S95F OLED 65" HDR10+, HDR10, HLG
  • Smart OS: LG C5 OLED 65" webOS 25 vs Samsung S95F OLED 65" Tizen

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

LG C5 OLED 65"

Testers rate the LG C5 a top mid-range OLED for picture, gaming and value. TechRadar lab-tested the exact 65-inch model (1,180 nits Filmmaker Mode peak, 99.4% P3, 9.2ms input lag). Tom's Guide called it their favorite TV of 2025 (hands-on, no lab measurements). What Hi-Fi tested the 42-inch (OLED42C5), not the 65-inch. Shared gripes: weak built-in audio, bright-room reflections, and only an incremental upgrade over the C4. (3 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Superb, vibrant, accurate picture quality and contrast; Excellent value and feature set for a mid-range OLED; Strong gaming feature set (4K 144Hz, VRR, low input lag).

Flagged: Built-in audio is weak/middling for immersive movie watching; Only an incremental upgrade over the C4; Screen reflections / glare hurt dark scenes in bright rooms.

Samsung S95F OLED 65"

Only one whitelisted tester source survived verification: Reviewed (USA Today), whose three cited sentences were re-confirmed verbatim on the page for the exact Samsung S95F model. No measured values (e.g., peak nits) are reported by this outlet, so the review is treated as observational (tested=false). RTINGS, TechRadar and Tom's Guide were excluded because their pages returned only navigation/truncated content with no retrievable body text or measured values. Reviewed praises QD-OLED brightness and contrast but flags the lack of Dolby Vision, weak built-in speakers, and that the 83-inch size uses a traditional OLED panel rather than QD-OLED. (1 sourced review.)

Praised: QD-OLED panel delivers deep blacks, infinite contrast and vibrant, brighter colors.

Flagged: No Dolby Vision support; Built-in speakers lack immersion and deep bass; external sound system recommended; 83-inch size drops QD-OLED for a traditional OLED panel.

← All tvs compared · Open data