Samsung
Samsung S95F OLED 65"
$3299
Released 2025
Best TVs · head-to-head
Samsung S95F OLED 65" vs Panasonic Z95B OLED 65"
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Samsung S95F OLED 65" is cheaper at $3299. Every spec and price links to its source.
Panasonic
Panasonic Z95B OLED 65"
—
Released 2025
Which is better: the Samsung S95F OLED 65" or Panasonic Z95B OLED 65"?
The Samsung S95F OLED 65" wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Key specs, head to head
The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Samsung S95F OLED 65" | Panasonic Z95B OLED 65" |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $3299 | — |
| Brand | Samsung | Panasonic |
| Released | 2025 | 2025 |
| Screen (in) | 65 | 65 |
| Panel type | QD-OLED | OLED (Primary RGB Tandem) |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Refresh (Hz) | 165 | 144 |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | Dolby Vision IQ, HDR10+ Adaptive, HDR10, HLG |
| HDMI 2 1 ports | 4 | 2 |
| Smart OS | Tizen | Fire TV |
| Release | 2025 | 2025 |
Sources — Samsung S95F OLED 65": samsung.com (verified 2026-06-15). Panasonic Z95B OLED 65": panasonic.com (verified 2026-07-07).
What's the difference between the Samsung S95F OLED 65" and Panasonic Z95B OLED 65"?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Panel type: Samsung S95F OLED 65" QD-OLED vs Panasonic Z95B OLED 65" OLED (Primary RGB Tandem)
- Refresh (Hz): Samsung S95F OLED 65" 165 vs Panasonic Z95B OLED 65" 144
- HDR formats: Samsung S95F OLED 65" HDR10+, HDR10, HLG vs Panasonic Z95B OLED 65" Dolby Vision IQ, HDR10+ Adaptive, HDR10, HLG
- HDMI 2 1 ports: Samsung S95F OLED 65" 4 vs Panasonic Z95B OLED 65" 2
- Smart OS: Samsung S95F OLED 65" Tizen vs Panasonic Z95B OLED 65" Fire TV
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Samsung S95F OLED 65"
Only one whitelisted tester source survived verification: Reviewed (USA Today), whose three cited sentences were re-confirmed verbatim on the page for the exact Samsung S95F model. No measured values (e.g., peak nits) are reported by this outlet, so the review is treated as observational (tested=false). RTINGS, TechRadar and Tom's Guide were excluded because their pages returned only navigation/truncated content with no retrievable body text or measured values. Reviewed praises QD-OLED brightness and contrast but flags the lack of Dolby Vision, weak built-in speakers, and that the 83-inch size uses a traditional OLED panel rather than QD-OLED. (1 sourced review.)
Praised: QD-OLED panel delivers deep blacks, infinite contrast and vibrant, brighter colors.
Flagged: No Dolby Vision support; Built-in speakers lack immersion and deep bass; external sound system recommended; 83-inch size drops QD-OLED for a traditional OLED panel.
Panasonic Z95B OLED 65"
No sourced tester review yet.