Best Wi-Fi Routers · head-to-head

Netgear Nighthawk RAXE500 vs Google Nest Wifi Pro

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Google Nest Wifi Pro is cheaper at $199.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Netgear Nighthawk RAXE500 or Google Nest Wifi Pro?

The Netgear Nighthawk RAXE500 wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Google Nest Wifi Pro is the cheaper at $199.99. Get the Netgear Nighthawk RAXE500 for the stronger spec sheet, the Google Nest Wifi Pro to spend less.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Key specs, head to head

The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.

Max speed (Mbps)
Netgear Nighthawk RAXE500 10800
Google Nest Wifi Pro 5400

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Netgear Nighthawk RAXE500 Google Nest Wifi Pro
US price $699.99 $199.99
BrandNetgearGoogle
Released2021-102022-10
Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)
Max speed (Mbps) 10800 5400
Bands Tri-band (2.4 GHz + 5 GHz + 6 GHz) Tri-band (2.4 GHz + 5 GHz + 6 GHz)
Coverage (sq ft) 3500 2200
Ports 1x 1 Gbps WAN, 4x 1 Gbps LAN, 1x 2.5 Gbps Multi-Gig (configurable WAN/LAN), 2x USB 3.0 2x Gigabit Ethernet (WAN/LAN)
Mesh No Yes
Processor Quad-core 1.8 GHz Qualcomm IPQ5018 dual-core 1.0 GHz
Release 2021-10 2022-10

Sources — Netgear Nighthawk RAXE500: smallnetbuilder.com (verified 2026-06-15). Google Nest Wifi Pro: en.wikipedia.org (verified 2026-06-15).

What's the difference between the Netgear Nighthawk RAXE500 and Google Nest Wifi Pro?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Max speed (Mbps): Netgear Nighthawk RAXE500 10800 vs Google Nest Wifi Pro 5400
  • Coverage (sq ft): Netgear Nighthawk RAXE500 3500 vs Google Nest Wifi Pro 2200
  • Ports: Netgear Nighthawk RAXE500 1x 1 Gbps WAN, 4x 1 Gbps LAN, 1x 2.5 Gbps Multi-Gig (configurable WAN/LAN), 2x USB 3.0 vs Google Nest Wifi Pro 2x Gigabit Ethernet (WAN/LAN)
  • Mesh: Netgear Nighthawk RAXE500 false vs Google Nest Wifi Pro true
  • Processor: Netgear Nighthawk RAXE500 Quad-core 1.8 GHz vs Google Nest Wifi Pro Qualcomm IPQ5018 dual-core 1.0 GHz

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Netgear Nighthawk RAXE500

Two whitelisted testers (Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide) lab-benched this exact RAXE500. Both praise record-setting close-range throughput (Tom's Guide measured 2.396 Gbps at 15 feet, boosted by the 6GHz Wi-Fi 6E band) but flag steep falloff with distance and a very high ~$599 price. Tom's Hardware additionally found severe congestion/QoS problems and did not recommend the router; Tom's Guide did not run a congestion test and named it Editor's Choice. RTINGS not found. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)

Praised: Class-leading throughput at close range, boosted by the 6GHz Wi-Fi 6E band; Distinctive winged design.

Flagged: Throughput drops off sharply with distance; best used close up; Very expensive (~$599), roughly triple a high-end Wi-Fi 6 router; Bundled security/support becomes a paid subscription after the trial (~$70/yr).

Google Nest Wifi Pro

Across two whitelisted testers (Tom's Guide, lab-benched with IxChariot; Engadget, hands-on), the Nest Wifi Pro is a cheap, tiny, easy-to-set-up Wi-Fi 6E mesh whose performance disappoints, especially at range. Both sources agree it trails rivals on raw speed but wins on ease of use and price. (2 sourced reviews, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Very easy setup and beginner-friendly Google Home app; Small, attractive design that's easy to hide; Reasonably priced entry into Wi-Fi 6E plus Matter/Thread support.

Flagged: Lackluster throughput, drops off steeply at distance (52.5Mbps at 50ft); Bested by competitors on raw speed and power; Locked-down 'Pro' in name only: no browser controls, limited manual tuning, only two LAN ports.

← All wi-fi routers compared · Open data