TP-Link
TP-Link Archer AXE75
$149.99Cheaper
Released 2022
Best Wi-Fi Routers · head-to-head
TP-Link Archer AXE75 vs GL.iNet Flint 3 (GL-BE9300)
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. TP-Link Archer AXE75 is cheaper at $149.99. Every spec and price links to its source.
No photo yet
GL.iNet
GL.iNet Flint 3 (GL-BE9300)
$209.99
Released 2025-06
Which is better: the TP-Link Archer AXE75 or GL.iNet Flint 3 (GL-BE9300)?
The GL.iNet Flint 3 (GL-BE9300) wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The TP-Link Archer AXE75 is the cheaper at $149.99. Get the GL.iNet Flint 3 (GL-BE9300) for the stronger spec sheet, the TP-Link Archer AXE75 to spend less.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Key specs, head to head
The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec |  TP-Link Archer AXE75 | GL.iNet Flint 3 (GL-BE9300) |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $149.99 | $209.99 |
| Brand | TP-Link | GL.iNet |
| Released | 2022 | 2025-06 |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) |
| Max speed (Mbps) | 5400 | 9300 |
| Bands | Tri-band (2.4 GHz 574 Mbps + 5 GHz 2402 Mbps + 6 GHz 2402 Mbps) | Tri-band (2.4 GHz 688 Mbps + 5 GHz 2882 Mbps + 6 GHz 5765 Mbps) |
| Coverage (sq ft) | — | 2000 |
| Ports | 1x 2.5 Gbps WAN/LAN, 1x 1 Gbps WAN/LAN, 3x 1 Gbps LAN, 1x USB 2.0 | 1x 2.5 Gbps WAN, 1x 2.5 Gbps WAN/LAN, 3x 2.5 Gbps LAN, 1x USB 3.0 |
| Mesh | Yes | Yes |
| Processor | — | Qualcomm quad-core 1.5 GHz |
| Release | 2022 | 2025-06 |
Sources — TP-Link Archer AXE75: tp-link.com (verified 2026-06-15). GL.iNet Flint 3 (GL-BE9300): gl-inet.com (verified 2026-10-15).
What's the difference between the TP-Link Archer AXE75 and GL.iNet Flint 3 (GL-BE9300)?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Wi-Fi standard: TP-Link Archer AXE75 Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) vs GL.iNet Flint 3 (GL-BE9300) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be)
- Max speed (Mbps): TP-Link Archer AXE75 5400 vs GL.iNet Flint 3 (GL-BE9300) 9300
- Bands: TP-Link Archer AXE75 Tri-band (2.4 GHz 574 Mbps + 5 GHz 2402 Mbps + 6 GHz 2402 Mbps) vs GL.iNet Flint 3 (GL-BE9300) Tri-band (2.4 GHz 688 Mbps + 5 GHz 2882 Mbps + 6 GHz 5765 Mbps)
- Ports: TP-Link Archer AXE75 1x 2.5 Gbps WAN/LAN, 1x 1 Gbps WAN/LAN, 3x 1 Gbps LAN, 1x USB 2.0 vs GL.iNet Flint 3 (GL-BE9300) 1x 2.5 Gbps WAN, 1x 2.5 Gbps WAN/LAN, 3x 2.5 Gbps LAN, 1x USB 3.0
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
TP-Link Archer AXE75
Only one whitelisted tester with real hands-on lab text was usable: Tom's Hardware, which lab-tested throughput and latency (Iperf + ping across four scenarios and three bands) and rated it mediocre. This is a single-source, lab-tested verdict, not a cross-source consensus. All three quotes and the 3% packet-loss figure were confirmed as literal substrings of the article. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Solid 5-GHz throughput and acceptable/decent 2.4-GHz performance for a budget Wi-Fi 6E entry; Useful extras: USB 3.0 file/media sharing, auto-update scheduling, overall low mean-average latency.
Flagged: Many important features are smartphone-app (Tether) only, some behind a HomeShield Pro subscription; 6 GHz is no faster than 5 GHz and performance isn't much better than cheaper Wi-Fi 6 routers; Large latency swings and packet loss under some conditions (3% packet loss on 6 GHz near-uncongested).
GL.iNet Flint 3 (GL-BE9300)
No sourced tester review yet.