Coway
Coway AP-1512HH Mighty
$229Cheaper
Released 2016
Best Air Purifiers · head-to-head
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Coway AP-1512HH Mighty is cheaper at $229. Every spec and price links to its source.
Coway
$229Cheaper
Released 2016
Blueair
$349.99
Released 2022
The Blueair Blue Pure 211i Max wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Coway AP-1512HH Mighty is the cheaper at $229. Get the Blueair Blue Pure 211i Max for the stronger spec sheet, the Coway AP-1512HH Mighty to spend less.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | | |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $229 | $349.99 |
| Brand | Coway | Blueair |
| Released | 2016 | 2022 |
| Cadr smoke (CFM) | 233 | 443 |
| Coverage (sq ft) | 360 | 674 |
| Hepa | Yes | Yes |
| Filter type | Pre-filter + Activated Carbon + True HEPA + Ionizer (switchable) | HEPASilent dual filtration (mechanical + electrostatic) + Activated Carbon, 4-layer |
| Noise db min | 24.4 | 23 |
| Smart | No | Yes |
| Energy star | Yes | Yes |
| Release | 2016 | 2022 |
Sources — Coway AP-1512HH Mighty: breathequality.com (verified 2026-06-15). Blueair Blue Pure 211i Max: blueair.com (verified 2026-06-15).
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
HouseFresh's chamber test rates the Coway AP-1512HH Mighty a strong cleaner — clearing incense smoke in a 728 cu ft lab in 26 minutes at top speed with a 247.7 CFM dust CADR — but flags it as unusually power-hungry (75.3W) and now dated, with better-value rivals available. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Strong, fast air-cleaning performance (26 min to clear room at top speed) with decent value when the ionizer runs at full speed; Very cheap and widely available OEM/generic replacement filters.
Flagged: Much more power-hungry than similarly performing purifiers (75.3W at Speed 3), raising long-term running cost; Design is dated versus modern units; performance-per-dollar drops sharply without the ionizer and at lower speeds.
Only one whitelisted tester, Wirecutter, published hands-on measured results for this exact model, naming it their large-room upgrade pick. Wirecutter found it a stellar, quiet, energy-efficient large-room performer (>99.9% smoke reduction), with a durability caveat on the washable fabric cover. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)
Praised: Stellar large-room particle/smoke reduction (>99.9% in the 30-minute test); Very quiet for its power (<=41 dBA on its four lower speeds); Energy efficient (41 W max; 11-18 W in normal everyday use).
Flagged: Fabric cover looks shaggy over time and lost elasticity after a few washes, needing replacement; Shorter filter replacement cycle (6-9 months vs a typical year); Relatively high price and overkill for small-to-medium rooms.