Best Camera Lenses · head-to-head

Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S vs Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II is cheaper at $1199. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S or Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II is the cheaper at $1199.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II
US price $2399.95 $1199
BrandNikonFujifilm
Released2019-022024-11
Focal length (mm) 24-70 16-55
Max aperture f 2.8 2.8
Lens mount Nikon Z Fujifilm X
Format coverage full-frame APS-C
Optical stabilization No No
Min focus distance (m) 0.38 0.3
Max magnification 0.22 0.21
Filter thread (mm) 82 72
Aperture blades 9 11
Weather sealed Yes
Weight grams 805 410

Sources — Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S: nikonusa.com (verified 2026-07-11). Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II: fujifilm-x.com (verified 2026-07-11).

What's the difference between the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S and Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (8 of 11). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Focal length (mm): Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S 24-70 vs Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II 16-55
  • Lens mount: Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Nikon Z vs Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II Fujifilm X
  • Format coverage: Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S full-frame vs Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II APS-C
  • Min focus distance (m): Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S 0.38 vs Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II 0.3
  • Max magnification: Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S 0.22 vs Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II 0.21
  • Filter thread (mm): Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S 82 vs Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II 72
  • Aperture blades: Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S 9 vs Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II 11
  • Weight grams: Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S 805 vs Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II 410

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S

Only one whitelisted tester, TechRadar, returned a real hands-on review of this exact original model. TechRadar rates it excellent: stellar wide-open sharpness, fast near-silent autofocus and strong build, faulting vignetting, distortion and a non-clickable control ring. (1 sourced review.)

Praised: Stellar sharpness even wide open at f/2.8, maintained superbly to the edges; Fast, smooth and almost silent autofocus motor; Excellent build quality and weather sealing.

Flagged: Moderate vignetting at wider apertures, not auto-corrected by the built-in raw profile; Barrel and pincushion distortion visible when lens corrections are disabled; De-clicked control ring cannot be switched to clicked operation.

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II

No sourced tester review yet.

← All camera lenses compared · Open data