Best Charcoal Grills · head-to-head

Kamado Joe Classic Joe III vs Char-Griller AKORN Kamado

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Char-Griller AKORN Kamado is cheaper at $399.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Kamado Joe Classic Joe III or Char-Griller AKORN Kamado?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Char-Griller AKORN Kamado is the cheaper at $399.99.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Kamado Joe Classic Joe III Char-Griller AKORN Kamado
US price $2199.99 $399.99
BrandKamado JoeChar-Griller
Released2019
Type kamado kamado
Primary cooking area sqin 250 325
Material Thick-walled ceramic dome with 304 stainless steel grates and hardware Triple-walled insulated steel with cast iron cooking grates
Hinged cooking grate No No
Ash catcher No Yes
Built in thermometer Yes Yes
Diameter or size (in) 18 in 20 in
Release 2019

Sources — Kamado Joe Classic Joe III: kamadojoe.com (verified 2026-06-19). Char-Griller AKORN Kamado: chargriller.com (verified 2026-06-19).

What's the difference between the Kamado Joe Classic Joe III and Char-Griller AKORN Kamado?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Primary cooking area sqin: Kamado Joe Classic Joe III 250 vs Char-Griller AKORN Kamado 325
  • Material: Kamado Joe Classic Joe III Thick-walled ceramic dome with 304 stainless steel grates and hardware vs Char-Griller AKORN Kamado Triple-walled insulated steel with cast iron cooking grates
  • Ash catcher: Kamado Joe Classic Joe III false vs Char-Griller AKORN Kamado true
  • Diameter or size (in): Kamado Joe Classic Joe III 18 in vs Char-Griller AKORN Kamado 20 in

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Kamado Joe Classic Joe III

Only one whitelisted tester — Reviewed (USA Today), reviewed by professional chef Lindsay D. Mattison — produced a hands-on write-up of this exact model, listing it among the kamado grills the team tested. She was unimpressed: she praised the generous bundled accessories, an easy-to-remove ash drawer, and the locking lid with a burp release, but flagged a heavy lid that won't stay open, a screenless draft door as a safety risk, and side shelves that don't sit flat. No measured numbers were reported for this model. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Purchase price includes several accessories (stand, drop-down shelves, two-tier grates and deflector/pizza plates); Easy-to-remove ash drawer inside the firebox makes cleaning easy; Lid locks in place with an easy release button for burping.

Flagged: Heavy lid won't stay open; air-lift hinge adjustment isn't intuitive; Draft door has no screen, a potential safety risk of live coals escaping; Drop-down side shelves don't sit flat, resting at an upward angle.

Char-Griller AKORN Kamado

One whitelisted tester — Reviewed (USA Today) — hands-on tested this exact model (Char-Griller E16620 Akorn) and named it Best Value: it cooks just as well as a more expensive kamado and is very easy to clean, but struggles to hold low smoking temperatures and may not last as long as pricier ceramic kamados. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Works just as well as a more expensive kamado at a fraction of the cost (Best Value pick); Cast-iron grates deliver nice sear marks over direct heat; Very easy to clean — the entire bottom unhooks to dump ash.

Flagged: Hard to reach low smoking temperatures; floor around 275°F with a learning curve; Smokin' Stone deflector plate is smaller than the grate, so food on the edges over-chars; Build quality and durability lag pricier kamados.

← All charcoal grills compared · Open data