quip
quip Ultra Next Generation Smart Sonic Electric Toothbrush
$110
Released 2025-02
Best Electric Toothbrushes · head-to-head
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Colgate hum Smart Electric Toothbrush (Rechargeable) is cheaper at $69.99. Every spec and price links to its source.
quip
$110
Released 2025-02
Colgate
$69.99Cheaper
Released 2020
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Colgate hum Smart Electric Toothbrush (Rechargeable) is the cheaper at $69.99.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | | |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $110 | $69.99 |
| Brand | quip | Colgate |
| Released | 2025-02 | 2020 |
| Brush action | sonic | sonic |
| Cleaning modes | 16 | 3 |
| Battery days | 30 | 10 |
| Pressure sensor | Yes | No |
| Smart app | Yes | Yes |
| Smart timer | Yes | Yes |
| Travel case | Yes | Yes |
| Release year | 2025 | 2020 |
Sources — quip Ultra Next Generation Smart Sonic Electric Toothbrush: getquip.com (verified 2026-06-15). Colgate hum Smart Electric Toothbrush (Rechargeable): prnewswire.com (verified 2026-06-15).
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (3 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Only one whitelisted tester, Tom's Guide, published a hands-on review of this exact model (Quip Ultra Next Generation Smart Sonic Electric Toothbrush), naming it Editor's Choice. It is qualitative with no lab measurements. It praises easy use, visibly whiter teeth within a week, and up-to-30-day battery life, while flagging pricey replacement heads, mild tooth sensitivity at higher intensity, and gimmicky app 'smart' features. (1 sourced review.)
Praised: Incredibly user-friendly and comfortable to use; Teeth visibly whiter within one week of use; Battery lasts up to 30 days per charge, a standout.
Flagged: Replacement brush heads are expensive; Caused slight tooth sensitivity when brushing at higher intensity; App/'smart' features feel unnecessary and add little.
All three sources verified against live pages. Expect a likable app-guided experience but mediocre cleaning: Digital Trends and Engadget both found the guided-brushing app genuinely improves coverage (Engadget's self-test jumped from 49% to 98% coverage), and both liked the lightweight, well-designed body — but Digital Trends called cleaning merely superficial and Reviewed's plaque-reveal dye test left stain the Hum could not remove, with 'poor build quality' and 'short battery life' listed as cons. Rewards praise and affordability each trace to a single source. (3 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Guided-brushing app meaningfully improves coverage and technique; Lightweight, comfortable, well-designed handle; Points-based rewards program is a clever incentive to brush more.
Flagged: Mediocre plaque removal — superficial cleaning, failed Reviewed's plaque dye test; Cheap-feeling components: flimsy power button, unlined travel case; No true in-mouth position sensing — can be fooled by fake brushing motions.