Best LED Face Masks · head-to-head

Omnilux Contour FACE vs Qure Q-Rejuvalight Pro

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Omnilux Contour FACE is cheaper at $395. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Omnilux Contour FACE or Qure Q-Rejuvalight Pro?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Omnilux Contour FACE is the cheaper at $395.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Omnilux Contour FACE Qure Q-Rejuvalight Pro
US price $395 MSRP on omniluxled.com $399 MSRP on qureskincare.com
BrandOmniluxQure Skincare
Released20202024
LED count 132 160
Wavelengths (nm) 633 nm, 830 nm 415 nm, 605 nm, 630 nm, 660 nm, 880 nm
Fda cleared Yes Yes
Treatment time min 10 3
Rechargeable Yes Yes
Flexible silicone Yes Yes
Eye protection No Yes
Light modes 1 3

Sources — Omnilux Contour FACE: omniluxled.com (verified 2026-06-20). Qure Q-Rejuvalight Pro: qureskincare.com (verified 2026-06-20).

What's the difference between the Omnilux Contour FACE and Qure Q-Rejuvalight Pro?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.

  • LED count: Omnilux Contour FACE 132 vs Qure Q-Rejuvalight Pro 160
  • Wavelengths (nm): Omnilux Contour FACE 633 nm, 830 nm vs Qure Q-Rejuvalight Pro 415 nm, 605 nm, 630 nm, 660 nm, 880 nm
  • Treatment time min: Omnilux Contour FACE 10 vs Qure Q-Rejuvalight Pro 3
  • Eye protection: Omnilux Contour FACE false vs Qure Q-Rejuvalight Pro true
  • Light modes: Omnilux Contour FACE 1 vs Qure Q-Rejuvalight Pro 3

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Omnilux Contour FACE

One whitelisted tester (Reviewed/USA Today) reviewed the Omnilux Contour Face mask hands-on, wearing it four nights a week for six weeks in 10-minute sessions. Verdict: worth buying for the best science-backed claims among the LED masks tested, with a subtle but real improvement in skin quality. Downsides: the fit digs into high or Roman nose bridges, and the LEDs shine directly into unprotected eyes with no included eye shields. All quotes verified against the source. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Highest LED concentration among masks the tester compared (66 red + 66 near-infrared bulbs), meaning fewer gaps and more even coverage; Easy, hands-off 10-minute sessions with auto shut-off; no serum needed and packs flat for travel; Best science-backed claims of the LED masks tested, with subtle but real skin improvement over six weeks.

Flagged: Uncomfortable fit for high or Roman nose bridges — the mask digs into the bridge and sits higher; LEDs shine directly into unprotected eyes; no goggles or eye shields included, tester improvised by laying fabric over her eyes; Cannot realistically be worn during chores as the brand claims — tester had to lie down with a cloth over her eyes.

Qure Q-Rejuvalight Pro

Only one whitelisted tester (Reviewed/USA Today) has a hands-on review of this exact model. After a six-week wear test, Reviewed named the Q-Rejuvalight Pro its best-overall LED mask, praising customizable per-zone treatment via the Qure app and overall comfort, while flagging a head strap that bunches up and a less-than-luxurious eye insert. The test was qualitative with no lab-measured numbers. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Customizable per-zone treatment via the Qure app (red on aging areas, blue on breakout areas); Comfortable to wear; the light did not bother the tester's eyes; Visible results after six weeks: fewer chin breakouts and smoother forehead skin.

Flagged: Head strap bunches up and can be difficult to adjust; Eye insert/rubber is not the most comfortable or luxurious.

← All led face masks compared · Open data