Best LED Face Masks · head-to-head

Omnilux Contour FACE vs Shark CryoGlow LED Face Mask

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Shark CryoGlow LED Face Mask is cheaper at $349.99. Every spec and price links to its source.

Which is better: the Omnilux Contour FACE or Shark CryoGlow LED Face Mask?

On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Shark CryoGlow LED Face Mask is the cheaper at $349.99.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Omnilux Contour FACE Shark CryoGlow LED Face Mask
US price $395 MSRP on omniluxled.com $349.99
BrandOmniluxShark Beauty
Released20202025-02
LED count 132 160
Wavelengths (nm) 633 nm, 830 nm 630 nm, 830 nm
Fda cleared Yes Yes
Treatment time min 10 6
Rechargeable Yes Yes
Flexible silicone Yes No
Eye protection No No
Light modes 1 4

Sources — Omnilux Contour FACE: omniluxled.com (verified 2026-06-20). Shark CryoGlow LED Face Mask: sharkninja.com (verified 2026-06-20).

What's the difference between the Omnilux Contour FACE and Shark CryoGlow LED Face Mask?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 8). Matching specs are omitted.

  • LED count: Omnilux Contour FACE 132 vs Shark CryoGlow LED Face Mask 160
  • Wavelengths (nm): Omnilux Contour FACE 633 nm, 830 nm vs Shark CryoGlow LED Face Mask 630 nm, 830 nm
  • Treatment time min: Omnilux Contour FACE 10 vs Shark CryoGlow LED Face Mask 6
  • Flexible silicone: Omnilux Contour FACE true vs Shark CryoGlow LED Face Mask false
  • Light modes: Omnilux Contour FACE 1 vs Shark CryoGlow LED Face Mask 4

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Omnilux Contour FACE

One whitelisted tester (Reviewed/USA Today) reviewed the Omnilux Contour Face mask hands-on, wearing it four nights a week for six weeks in 10-minute sessions. Verdict: worth buying for the best science-backed claims among the LED masks tested, with a subtle but real improvement in skin quality. Downsides: the fit digs into high or Roman nose bridges, and the LEDs shine directly into unprotected eyes with no included eye shields. All quotes verified against the source. (1 sourced review, 1 lab-tested.)

Praised: Highest LED concentration among masks the tester compared (66 red + 66 near-infrared bulbs), meaning fewer gaps and more even coverage; Easy, hands-off 10-minute sessions with auto shut-off; no serum needed and packs flat for travel; Best science-backed claims of the LED masks tested, with subtle but real skin improvement over six weeks.

Flagged: Uncomfortable fit for high or Roman nose bridges — the mask digs into the bridge and sits higher; LEDs shine directly into unprotected eyes; no goggles or eye shields included, tester improvised by laying fabric over her eyes; Cannot realistically be worn during chores as the brand claims — tester had to lie down with a cloth over her eyes.

Shark CryoGlow LED Face Mask

No sourced tester review yet.

← All led face masks compared · Open data