LG
LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)
$299.99Cheaper
Released 2023
Best Portable Monitors · head-to-head
LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) vs espresso Display 15 Pro 4K
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) is cheaper at $299.99. Every spec and price links to its source.
espresso
espresso Display 15 Pro 4K
$699
Released 2023
Which is better: the LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) or espresso Display 15 Pro 4K?
The espresso Display 15 Pro 4K wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) is the cheaper at $299.99. Get the espresso Display 15 Pro 4K for the stronger spec sheet, the LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) to spend less.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) | espresso Display 15 Pro 4K |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $299.99 | $699 |
| Brand | LG | espresso |
| Released | 2023 | 2023 |
| Size (in) | 16 | 15 |
| Resolution | 2560x1600 | 3840x2160 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh (Hz) | 60 | 60 |
| Ports | 2x USB-C (DP Alt Mode) | 2x USB-C |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Weight (lb) | 2.18 | 1.76 |
| Release | 2023 | 2023 |
Sources — LG gram+view 16 (16MR70): newegg.com (verified 2026-06-15). espresso Display 15 Pro 4K: newegg.com (verified 2026-06-15).
What's the difference between the LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) and espresso Display 15 Pro 4K?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (5 of 7). Matching specs are omitted.
- Size (in): LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 16 vs espresso Display 15 Pro 4K 15
- Resolution: LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 2560x1600 vs espresso Display 15 Pro 4K 3840x2160
- Ports: LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 2x USB-C (DP Alt Mode) vs espresso Display 15 Pro 4K 2x USB-C
- Touchscreen: LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) false vs espresso Display 15 Pro 4K true
- Weight (lb): LG gram+view 16 (16MR70) 2.18 vs espresso Display 15 Pro 4K 1.76
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
LG gram+view 16 (16MR70)
Only one whitelisted outlet, TechRadar, covers the exact 16MR70, and only as a curated buying-guide blurb that defers its full lab review to non-whitelisted sister site ITPro. It praises the clear 16:10 IPS picture, the light 1.45lb build and easy two-USB-C setup, but flags the high price and weak fit for photo/design color work, noting brightness is only about average (~350 nits). RTINGS, Notebookcheck and Tom's Hardware published no hands-on review. (1 sourced review.)
Praised: Clear, good-quality 16:10 IPS picture; Lightweight and slim at 1.45lb, travel-friendly; Simple to set up and use via two USB-C ports.
Flagged: Priced high for a portable monitor; Not ideal for photo editing / design work; Brightness only about average (~350 nits).
espresso Display 15 Pro 4K
Three whitelisted testers (Tom's Hardware, Engadget, TechRadar) hands-on-reviewed the espresso 15 Pro and all recommend it as a premium 4K portable monitor, praising a bright, color-accurate display, anodised aluminum build, and a versatile magnetic Stand+. All three flag the steep $699 price. Two (Tom's Hardware, TechRadar) criticize weak built-in speakers, and two note the 60Hz cap limits gaming/video editing. Engadget, notably, never discusses the speakers. Every quote and measured value was verified as a literal substring of the fetched source text. (3 sourced reviews, 3 lab-tested.)
Praised: Bright, sharp, color-accurate 4K display; Premium anodised aluminum build quality; Versatile magnetic Stand+ with flexible positioning.
Flagged: High $699 price; Tinny, weak built-in speakers; 60Hz refresh rate limits gaming/video editing.