Bosch
Bosch GET75-6N
$339
Best Random Orbital Sanders · head-to-head
Bosch GET75-6N vs Makita BO5041K
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Makita BO5041K is cheaper at $149. Every spec and price links to its source.
Makita
Makita BO5041K
$149Cheaper
Which is better: the Bosch GET75-6N or Makita BO5041K?
On the specs we track, they're closely matched. The Makita BO5041K is the cheaper at $149.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Bosch GET75-6N | Makita BO5041K |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $339 | $149 |
| Brand | Bosch | Makita |
| Released | — | — |
| Power source | corded | corded |
| Pad diameter (in) | 6 | 5 |
| Orbit diameter (mm) | — | — |
| Oscillations per minute max | 7300 | 12000 |
| Variable speed | Yes | Yes |
| Amperage | 7.5 | 3 |
| Voltage | — | — |
| Dust collection type | vacuum-port | bag-and-port |
| Weight (lb) | 5.7 | — |
| Vibration ms2 | — | — |
| Noise level (dB) | — | — |
Sources — Bosch GET75-6N: boschtools.com (verified 2026-07-11). Makita BO5041K: makitatools.com (verified 2026-07-11).
What's the difference between the Bosch GET75-6N and Makita BO5041K?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (4 of 11). Matching specs are omitted.
- Pad diameter (in): Bosch GET75-6N 6 vs Makita BO5041K 5
- Oscillations per minute max: Bosch GET75-6N 7300 vs Makita BO5041K 12000
- Amperage: Bosch GET75-6N 7.5 vs Makita BO5041K 3
- Dust collection type: Bosch GET75-6N vacuum-port vs Makita BO5041K bag-and-port
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Bosch GET75-6N
Only one whitelisted tester covers the Bosch GET75-6N: Pro Tool Reviews, and its December 2019 piece is a hands-off preview, not a lab test, so there are no measured results. It praises the robust dual-mode Turbo removal, constant speed under load, and sub-Makita/Festool pricing, but defers judgment on whether Turbo truly replaces a belt sander. Non-whitelisted blogs were excluded. (1 sourced review.)
Praised: Robust dual-mode performance, with Turbo mode rated for 3X faster stock removal than standard random orbit; Maintains a constant speed under load so pressure changes do not bog it down; Priced a little below Makita and well below Festool for the 6-inch model.
Flagged: Reviewer withholds a verdict on whether Turbo mode can actually replace a belt sander; New model's gain mainly closes the gap to the tool's own Turbo mode rather than leaping past rivals.
Makita BO5041K
Only one whitelisted tester, Pro Tool Reviews, covers the exact BO5041K, and its March 2010 article is a hands-on preview rather than a measured lab test. It praises the sander's comfort, control, and long-term reliability while calling it a solid but unremarkable, non-revolutionary tool. No other whitelisted outlet reviewed this model. (1 sourced review.)
Praised: Rubberized palm grip offers ample comfort and control; Solid, reliable build expected to last a long time; Rotatable/adjustable front handle is a welcome touch on a more powerful sander.
Flagged: Evolutionary, not revolutionary — doesn't advance the category.