Bosch
Bosch GET75-6N
$339
Best Random Orbital Sanders · head-to-head
Bosch GET75-6N vs Ryobi RS290G
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Ryobi RS290G is cheaper at $69. Every spec and price links to its source.
Ryobi
Ryobi RS290G
$69Cheaper
Which is better: the Bosch GET75-6N or Ryobi RS290G?
The Ryobi RS290G wins 1 of the 1 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 0. The Ryobi RS290G is the cheaper at $69. The Ryobi RS290G both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Bosch GET75-6N | Ryobi RS290G |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $339 | $69 |
| Brand | Bosch | Ryobi |
| Released | — | — |
| Power source | corded | corded |
| Pad diameter (in) | 6 | 5 |
| Orbit diameter (mm) | — | — |
| Oscillations per minute max | 7300 | 12500 |
| Variable speed | Yes | No |
| Amperage | 7.5 | 2.6 |
| Voltage | — | — |
| Dust collection type | vacuum-port | bag |
| Weight (lb) | 5.7 | 4 |
| Vibration ms2 | — | — |
| Noise level (dB) | — | — |
Sources — Bosch GET75-6N: boschtools.com (verified 2026-07-11). Ryobi RS290G: ryobitools.com (verified 2026-07-11).
What's the difference between the Bosch GET75-6N and Ryobi RS290G?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (6 of 11). Matching specs are omitted.
- Pad diameter (in): Bosch GET75-6N 6 vs Ryobi RS290G 5
- Oscillations per minute max: Bosch GET75-6N 7300 vs Ryobi RS290G 12500
- Variable speed: Bosch GET75-6N true vs Ryobi RS290G false
- Amperage: Bosch GET75-6N 7.5 vs Ryobi RS290G 2.6
- Dust collection type: Bosch GET75-6N vacuum-port vs Ryobi RS290G bag
- Weight (lb): Bosch GET75-6N 5.7 vs Ryobi RS290G 4
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Bosch GET75-6N
Only one whitelisted tester covers the Bosch GET75-6N: Pro Tool Reviews, and its December 2019 piece is a hands-off preview, not a lab test, so there are no measured results. It praises the robust dual-mode Turbo removal, constant speed under load, and sub-Makita/Festool pricing, but defers judgment on whether Turbo truly replaces a belt sander. Non-whitelisted blogs were excluded. (1 sourced review.)
Praised: Robust dual-mode performance, with Turbo mode rated for 3X faster stock removal than standard random orbit; Maintains a constant speed under load so pressure changes do not bog it down; Priced a little below Makita and well below Festool for the 6-inch model.
Flagged: Reviewer withholds a verdict on whether Turbo mode can actually replace a belt sander; New model's gain mainly closes the gap to the tool's own Turbo mode rather than leaping past rivals.
Ryobi RS290G
No sourced tester review yet.