Apple
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
$999
Released 2024-09
Best Smartphones · head-to-head
Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs OnePlus 13
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. OnePlus 13 is cheaper at $899. Every spec and price links to its source.
OnePlus
OnePlus 13
$899Cheaper
Released 2025-01
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or OnePlus 13?
The OnePlus 13 wins 4 of the 5 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 1. The OnePlus 13 is the cheaper at $899. The OnePlus 13 both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Key specs, head to head
The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | OnePlus 13 |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $999 MSRP, 128GB | $899 MSRP, 256GB (US base, 12GB RAM) |
| Brand | Apple | OnePlus |
| Released | 2024-09 | 2025-01 |
| Display (in) | 6.3 | 6.82 |
| Display type | LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Refresh (Hz) | 120 | 120 |
| Chipset | Apple A18 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| RAM (GB) | 8 | 12 |
| Storage (GB) | 128 | 256 |
| Main camera (MP) | 48 | 50 |
| Battery (mAh) | 3582 | 6000 |
| Charge (W) | 25 | 80 |
| Weight (g) | 199 | 210 |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 15 |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP69 |
| Fiveg | Yes | Yes |
Sources — Apple iPhone 16 Pro: gsmarena.com (verified 2026-06-15). OnePlus 13: gsmarena.com (verified 2026-06-15).
What's the difference between the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and OnePlus 13?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (11 of 13). Matching specs are omitted.
- Display (in): Apple iPhone 16 Pro 6.3 vs OnePlus 13 6.82
- Display type: Apple iPhone 16 Pro LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED vs OnePlus 13 LTPO AMOLED
- Chipset: Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro vs OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
- RAM (GB): Apple iPhone 16 Pro 8 vs OnePlus 13 12
- Storage (GB): Apple iPhone 16 Pro 128 vs OnePlus 13 256
- Main camera (MP): Apple iPhone 16 Pro 48 vs OnePlus 13 50
- Battery (mAh): Apple iPhone 16 Pro 3582 vs OnePlus 13 6000
- Charge (W): Apple iPhone 16 Pro 25 vs OnePlus 13 80
- Weight (g): Apple iPhone 16 Pro 199 vs OnePlus 13 210
- OS: Apple iPhone 16 Pro iOS 18 vs OnePlus 13 Android 15
- IP rating: Apple iPhone 16 Pro IP68 vs OnePlus 13 IP69
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Across three lab-testing outlets (GSMArena, Notebookcheck, Tom's Guide), the iPhone 16 Pro is a class-leading performer with excellent battery endurance, but testers agree its display brightness barely improved and its GPU trails the Galaxy S24 Ultra. Charging remains comparatively slow. No camera-quality benchmarks aggregated here. (3 sourced reviews, 3 lab-tested.)
Praised: Class-leading CPU performance / very high benchmark scores (A18 Pro); Excellent, class-leading battery life / endurance; Bright, accurate display measuring above stated typical brightness.
Flagged: Comparatively slow charging (~30W, full charge ~1.4-1.8h); GPU / graphics performance trails Galaxy S24 Ultra; Display brightness barely changed vs iPhone 15 Pro.
OnePlus 13
Four whitelisted testers (Notebookcheck, GSMArena, Tom's Guide, Engadget) all lab-benchmarked the OnePlus 13 and rate it a top-value flagship: class-leading 6,000mAh battery life, fast Snapdragon 8 Elite performance, and quick charging. Shared knocks: real-world brightness falls short of the 4,500-nit claim, heavy GPU throttling, and merely good low-light cameras. (4 sourced reviews, 4 lab-tested.)
Praised: Class-leading battery life from the 6,000mAh silicon-carbon cell (19h45m to 38h41m across tests); Fast Snapdragon 8 Elite performance, ~9,000+ Geekbench 6 multi-core; Very fast wired charging (~35-40 min to full).
Flagged: Measured brightness (~1,100-1,200 nits) far below the advertised 4,500-nit peak claim; Heavy GPU throttling under sustained load (~50% stability, hot bottom at 46°C); Cameras only good, not top-tier, especially in low light.