Samsung
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
$1299.99
Released 2025-02
Best Smartphones · head-to-head
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs OnePlus 13
A sourced, side-by-side comparison. OnePlus 13 is cheaper at $899. Every spec and price links to its source.
OnePlus
OnePlus 13
$899Cheaper
Released 2025-01
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or OnePlus 13?
The OnePlus 13 wins 2 of the 3 specs we compare head to head; the other wins 1. The OnePlus 13 is the cheaper at $899. The OnePlus 13 both leads on specs and costs less — the straightforward pick.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices verified at capture; live price may differ.
Key specs, head to head
The numbers that decide it, drawn to scale — longer bar wins, the accent bar is the stronger figure.
Full spec sheet
✓ marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | OnePlus 13 |
|---|---|---|
| US price | $1299.99 MSRP, 256GB (base config) | $899 MSRP, 256GB (US base, 12GB RAM) |
| Brand | Samsung | OnePlus |
| Released | 2025-02 | 2025-01 |
| Display (in) | 6.9 | 6.82 |
| Display type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Refresh (Hz) | 120 | 120 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| RAM (GB) | 12 | 12 |
| Storage (GB) | 256 | 256 |
| Main camera (MP) | 200 | 50 |
| Battery (mAh) | 5000 | 6000 |
| Charge (W) | 45 | 80 |
| Weight (g) | 218 | 210 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP69 |
| Fiveg | Yes | Yes |
Sources — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: gsmarena.com (verified 2026-06-15). OnePlus 13: gsmarena.com (verified 2026-06-15).
What's the difference between the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and OnePlus 13?
Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (8 of 13). Matching specs are omitted.
- Display (in): Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 6.9 vs OnePlus 13 6.82
- Display type: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X vs OnePlus 13 LTPO AMOLED
- Chipset: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy vs OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Main camera (MP): Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 200 vs OnePlus 13 50
- Battery (mAh): Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 vs OnePlus 13 6000
- Charge (W): Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 45 vs OnePlus 13 80
- Weight (g): Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 218 vs OnePlus 13 210
- IP rating: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra IP68 vs OnePlus 13 IP69
What reviewers say
Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Two whitelisted lab testers (Tom's Guide, GSMArena) reviewed the exact Galaxy S25 Ultra. Both praise the overclocked Snapdragon 8 Elite speed, and Tom's Guide measured strong battery endurance (17h14m). Display measurements diverge by methodology. Both flag the slow 45W charging (~59 min to full); GSMArena calls the panel solid but not cutting-edge, while Tom's Guide rates the display excellent and brighter than the iPhone 16 Pro Max. (2 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)
Praised: Fast overclocked Snapdragon 8 Elite performance, one of the fastest phones tested; Excellent, bright display beating iPhone 16 Pro Max in Tom's Guide lab (1,860 nits); Strong battery endurance (17h14m Tom's Guide test).
Flagged: Slow 45W charging, ~59 minutes to full; Qi2 support lacks built-in magnets; needs a special case; Display is solid but not cutting-edge per spec / dims quickly at peak.
OnePlus 13
Four whitelisted testers (Notebookcheck, GSMArena, Tom's Guide, Engadget) all lab-benchmarked the OnePlus 13 and rate it a top-value flagship: class-leading 6,000mAh battery life, fast Snapdragon 8 Elite performance, and quick charging. Shared knocks: real-world brightness falls short of the 4,500-nit claim, heavy GPU throttling, and merely good low-light cameras. (4 sourced reviews, 4 lab-tested.)
Praised: Class-leading battery life from the 6,000mAh silicon-carbon cell (19h45m to 38h41m across tests); Fast Snapdragon 8 Elite performance, ~9,000+ Geekbench 6 multi-core; Very fast wired charging (~35-40 min to full).
Flagged: Measured brightness (~1,100-1,200 nits) far below the advertised 4,500-nit peak claim; Heavy GPU throttling under sustained load (~50% stability, hot bottom at 46°C); Cameras only good, not top-tier, especially in low light.