Best Smartwatches · head-to-head

Garmin Venu 3 vs Amazfit Active 2

A sourced, side-by-side comparison. Garmin Venu 3 is cheaper at $450. Every spec and price links to its source.

Full spec sheet

marks the stronger figure where "more" — or "less", for price and weight — is unambiguously better.

Spec Garmin Venu 3 Amazfit Active 2
US price $450 MSRP, 45mm at launch
BrandGarminAmazfit
Released2023-08
Case size (mm) 45 44
Display type AMOLED AMOLED
Battery hr 336
Gps Yes Yes
Lte option No No
Water resistance (m) 50 50
OS Garmin OS Zepp OS
Ecg Yes No
Weight (g) 30 30
Release 2023-08

Sources — Garmin Venu 3: androidpolice.com (verified 2026-06-15). Amazfit Active 2: amazfit.com (verified 2026-07-07).

What's the difference between the Garmin Venu 3 and Amazfit Active 2?

Where the two actually differ on the specs we track (3 of 9). Matching specs are omitted.

  • Case size (mm): Garmin Venu 3 45 vs Amazfit Active 2 44
  • OS: Garmin Venu 3 Garmin OS vs Amazfit Active 2 Zepp OS
  • Ecg: Garmin Venu 3 true vs Amazfit Active 2 false

What reviewers say

Sourced tester consensus for each — the "what people who used it think" layer, not just specs.

Garmin Venu 3

Across four hands-on whitelisted reviews (Reviewed and DC Rainmaker lab-measured; TechRadar and Tom's Guide hands-on-only), the Venu 3 is praised as an excellent fitness/health tracker with a stunning AMOLED screen and multi-day battery. Consistent knocks: high price, weak third-party apps, no LTE, and durability/scratch concerns. (4 sourced reviews, 2 lab-tested.)

Praised: Bright, colorful 1.4-inch AMOLED display readable in all conditions; Long multi-day battery life, far beyond Apple/Samsung rivals; Accurate, detailed fitness and health tracking (HR within 1 BPM of chest strap).

Flagged: High price for a Garmin lacking premium training metrics; Limited third-party apps and no LTE; Durability concerns — Gorilla Glass 3 scratches easily, plasticky build.

Amazfit Active 2

No sourced tester review yet.

← All smartwatches compared · Open data