Answers · updated Jun 10, 2026
Upfirst vs AIRA: which AI receptionist is cheaper?
Upfirst and AIRA publish byte-identical pricing — the same four per-call tiers, the same included-call quotas and the same per-call overage rates — so neither is cheaper than the other. Both resolve to the same $159.95/mo at 200 calls/mo. The two appear to share a pricing engine or white-label lineage; we record each from its own source rather than treat them as one. Choose on integrations and language support, not price.
As of Jun 10, 2026 · figures linked to their source in the table below
The data behind this answer
| Vendor | Cost @ 200 calls/mo | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Upfirst | $159.95 upfirst.ai verified Jun 10, 2026 | Pro |
| AIRA | $159.95 getaira.io verified Jun 10, 2026 | Pro |
Figures normalized and sourced as of Jun 10, 2026. See the methodology for how each number is captured, dated and normalized, or the full comparison matrix for every vendor.
Frequently asked
- Why do Upfirst and AIRA cost the same?
- Their published pricing tables match exactly — identical tier prices, included-call counts and per-call overage. That strongly suggests a shared pricing engine or white-label relationship. We list both independently, each with its own source URL and verified date, rather than collapse them.
- If price is identical, how do I choose between them?
- Compare the non-price fields: named integrations and stated language support, which can differ even when pricing is cloned. Check each vendor profile for the integration list and bilingual claim, and test the booking flow you actually need before committing.
- Are these prices verified?
- Each figure links to the vendor's own pricing page with the date we captured it. The identical-pricing observation is itself a data finding from those two sources, not an assumption — re-check both pages, as a white-label price can diverge later.